SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 426

ARUN MONGA
Hansraj S/o Amraram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Gupta
For the Respondent: Mr. Mukhtyar Khan, PP

ORDER :

ARUN MONGA, J.

1. Aggrieved against the revision court order dated 05.04.2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sujangarh, District Churu, upholding an order dated 20.12.2023, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Bidasar, District Churu in Criminal Complaint case No.88/2021, whereby application preferred by petitioner seeking hand writing expert’s opinion under Section 45 of Indian Evidence Act read with Section 293 Cr.P.C. was rejected.

2. Respondent No.2/complainant has filed a criminal complaint against petitioner for dishonor of a cheque under Section 138 of N.I. Act stating that the cheque was issued by petitioner in discharge of a loan liability.

3. The petitioner submitted an application seeking expert opinion on the cheque signature and amount entry/hand writing thereof. Petitioner states that he neither took loan from respondent firm nor helped anyone to get loan from the respondent firm nor issued any cheque to the complainant firm. The petitioner states that respondent firm conspired with a person named Shyam Sundar to forge the cheque in question.

3.1 It is submitted by the petitioner that he never gave cheque in question to respondent firm in lieu of an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top