PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, MUNNURI LAXMAN
Padam Raj Bhandari S/o Shri Ajit Raj Bhandari – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This writ petition under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:
2. Any other appropriate writ, order or direction, which may be considered just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may be issued in favour of the petitioner.”
2. The petitioner, who is an Insurance Surveyor, filed an application on 12.05.2016 seeking condonation of delay under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act in order to claim a refund for the assessment year 2009-10 to 2014-15. However, the respondents rejected the application for condonation of delay on 27.02.2017.
3. Mr. T.C. Gupta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that the petitioner, a senior citizen now aged about 72 years, faced genuine hardship, and thus, ought to have been granted benefit under Section 119(2)(b) of the
Ashok Kapil v. Sana Ullah (dead) & ors. (1996) 6 SCC 342 at 345
Deep Narayan Gupta Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes reported in 2003 264 ITR 251
Kusheshwar Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar & ors. (2007) 11 SCC 447
Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar (2003) 8 SCC 673 at 692
Union of India & ors. v. Major General Madan Lal Yadav (Retd.) (1996) 4 SCC 127
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.