Jaipal @ Jp, S/o. Radhey Shyam vs State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Raj) 543

FARJAND ALI
Jaipal @ Jp, S/o. Radhey Shyam – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Manjeet Godara.
For the Respondent: Mr. Vikram Sharma, PP., Mr. J.S. Bhaleria, Mr. Praveen Karwa.

ORDER :

(Arjand Ali, J.) :

1. The jurisdiction of this court has been invoked by way of filing the second bail application under Section 439 CrPC at the instance of accused-petitioner. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:

S.No.	Particulars of the Case
1.	FIR Number	647/2018
2.	Concerned Police Station	Hanumangarh Junction
3.	District	Hanumangarh
4.	Offences alleged in the	FIR Sections 302/34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act
5.	Offences added, if any	Section 302/149, 120B, 212 of IPC
6.	Date of passing of impugned order	05.07.2023

2. The first bail application of petitioner came to be dismissed by the Coordinate Bench Court vide order 28.01.2021 passed in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.12807/2020.

3. It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioner that no case for the alleged offences is made out against him and his incarceration is not warranted. There are several flaws and laches in the case of the prosecution. There are no factors at play in the case at hand that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(Raj) 543

FARJAND ALIJaipal @ Jp, S/o. Radhey Shyam – AppellantVersusState Of Rajasthan, Through PP – Respondent

Cases Referred (6)

FARJAND ALI
Jaipal @ Jp, S/o. Radhey Shyam – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP – Respondent