SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 660

ARUN MONGA
Kera Ram S/o Shri Jai Karan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. J.S. Bhaleria, Mr. Mukesh Rajpurohit, Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Mr. Kuldeep Singh Solanki, Mr. Praveen Karwa, Mr. Manoj Kumar Pareek, Mr. Mahendra Vishnoi, Mr. Dheerendra Singh Sodha, Mr. Pawan Singh, Mr. Rakesh Matoria, Mr. Mahendra Singh Godara, Mr. Vijay Kumar, Mr. Vinod Jhajharia (through VC), Mr. Kaushal Sharma, Mr. Vikas Bijarnia, Mr. Jay Prakash, Mr. Mukesh Vyas, Mr. Jagatveer Singh, Mr. N.R. Budania, Mr. Govind Lal, Mr. Sachin Saraswat (through VC), Ms. Saroj Patel, Mr. Hemant Dutt, Mr. Ramawatar Singh, Mr. VLS Rajpurohit, Mr. Sushil Solanki, Mr. Sunil Beniwal, Mr. Hanuman Singh, Mr. Sunil Purohit, Mr. Awar Dan Ujjwal, Mr. D.S. Pidiyar, Mr. Shailendra Gwala, Mr. Shree Kant Verma, Mr. Narpat Singh Rajpurohit, Mr. Pritam Joshi, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Poonia, Mr. Jassa Ram, Mr. Sumer Singh Gour, Mr. Hemant Shrimali, Mr. M.R. Khatri, Mr. Vikram Singh Bhawla, Mr. Harshvardhan Singh Chundawat, Mr. Rishabh Tayal, Mr. P.R. Kumawat, Mr. K.L Chouhan, Mr. O.P.. Sangwa, Mr. Bheru Lal Jat, Mr. Devendra Sanwalot, Mr. Hapu Ram, Mr. Kamlesh Choudhary, Mr. Tanwar Singh, Mr. Manish Dadhich, Mr. Sandeep Kalwaniya, Mr. Surendra Singh Choudhary, Mr. Chandraveer Singh, Mr. Shardul Singh, Mr. O.P. Kumawat, Mr. Jitendra Choudhary, Mr. Virendra Acharya, Mr. Ramesh Dewasi, Mr. Nikhil Bhandari, Mr. Harish Kumar Purohit.
For the Respondent: Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi, AAG, Mr. Gaurav Bishnoi, Mr. Lalit Pareek, Mr. Rajdeep Singh, Mr. Sanjay Nahar, Mr. H.S. Chundawat.

Table of Content
1. legality and specifics of transfer orders are challenged. (Para 1 , 4)
2. the nature of employee transfers is generally routine. (Para 2 , 5)
3. validity of transfers without specified locations. (Para 6)
4. the importance of statutory compliance in transfer processes. (Para 10 , 11)
5. requirement for detailed transfer orders under statutory provisions. (Para 13 , 19)
6. decentralization principles govern transfer powers. (Para 14 , 21 , 30)
7. new guidelines for transfers established to prevent litigation. (Para 31 , 32)

JUDGMENT :

ARUN MONGA, J.

1. Under challenge before this Court in this bunch of petitions are transfer orders of panchayat officials of the rank of Village Development Officers/Assistant Administrative Officer/Gram Sewak/LDC/Junior Assistants/Junior Technical Assistant/Gram Vikas Adhikari serving in Rajasthan, inter alia, alleging gross violation of statutory provisions of Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 read with Rules framed there under (to be referred as the ‘Act and the Rules, respectively).

2. Ordinarily, transfer of a government servant does not warrant any indulgence, same being integral part of service conditions and an essential incidence the

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top