Back
SUBODH ABHYANKAR
Ramesh Bhabar – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER
Subodh Abhyankar, J. - This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner/ a Panchayat Secretary under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the transfer order dated 07/07/2023, passed by respondent No.2 Chief Executive Officer, Jija Panchayat, Indore (M.P.) whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Gram Panchayat, Rangwasa, Janpad Panchayat, Indore to Gram Panchayat, Jafarabad, Janpad Panchayat, Mhow.
2. The order has been assailed by the petitioner on the ground that it does not comply with the mandatory provisions as prescribed under Rule 15(j) of M.P. Jila Panchayat (Business) Rules, 1998 (hereinafter referred to as 'Rules of 1998'), which clearly provides that all the cases including transfers etc. shall be brought for decision before the General Administrative Committee as prescribed under the aforesaid rules. In support of his submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner has also relied upon a decision rendered in the case of Rakesh Kumar Shakya vs. State of M.P. and another reported as 2010 (1) MPLJ 656 in which, the issue of transfer of Secretary of Gram Panchayat has been specifically dealt with, and in which the Court has relied upon the transfe
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory nature of Rule 15(j) of the M.P. Jila Panchayat (Business) Rules, 1998 and the significance of compliance with Rule 3(b), (d) and 6(7....
Transfer orders must specify duty locations and consult local governing bodies per statutory requirements, fostering transparency in governance.
Rule 8 is not a provision dealing with the procedural requirement or formality of processing an application etc. As a matter of fact, it is a power given to the State officials to effect transfers – ....
The court emphasized that compliance with transfer rules is mandatory, allowing ex-post facto consent to validate transfer orders while highlighting the need for humane considerations in administrati....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that transfers of employees from Panchayati Raj Institution must strictly comply with Rule 8 of the Rules of 2011.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the permissibility of transferring the petitioner under Rule 6(7) of the Rules of 2011 and the absence of a mandatory requirement for approval f....
Transfer of Panchayat Secretary must adhere to statutory processes under applicable rules, mandating review by the appropriate authority upon challenge.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
