SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1513

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Sandeep Mehta, J.
Jadav Kanwar - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1937 of 2021
Decided On : 11-08-2021

Advocates appeared:
Pradeep Shah, Advocate, Shrawan Bishnoi, Advocate, K.L. Thakur, Advocate

Anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 438 Cr.P.C. when the accused demonstrates cooperation with the investigation and there is no necessity for custodial interrogation.

Headnote:

BAIL - ANTICIPATORY BAIL - The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, a 73-year-old woman, facing allegations of submitting fabricated documents for election candidacy. The court emphasized the lack of necessity for custodial investigation given the petitioner's cooperation and age, interpreting Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. to favor pre-arrest bail in this context.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, Jadav Kanwar, faced arrest in connection with F.I.R. No.78/2019 for alleged forgery related to election documents. A previous FIR with similar allegations had resulted in a negative report against her.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner had cooperated with the investigation and noted her age and previous completion of her term as Sarpanch, indicating no need for custodial interrogation.

Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. given the allegations of forgery and the circumstances of the case.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that anticipatory bail can be granted when the accused cooperates with the investigation and there is no necessity for custodial interrogation, especially considering the age and background of the petitioner.

Result: The anticipatory bail application was allowed, and the petitioner was directed to be released on bail upon fulfilling certain conditions.

JUDGMENT

Sandeep Mehta, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel representing the complainant and perused the material available on record.

2. This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with F.I.R. No.78/2019 Police Station Bagra, District Jalore for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 474 and 120-B IPC.

3. The prosecution has come out with a case that the petitioner submitted fabricated documents for contesting the election of Sarpanch in the year 2015. Previously, an FIR No.78/2015 was registered against the petitioner with these very allegations. In the said FIR, after thorough investigation, the IO submitted a negative final report which has been accepted by the court concerned. Thereafter, in the year 2019, a fresh FIR came to be registered with the very same allegation that the petitioner presented fabricated documents for contesting elections and that signatures of one Otaram as appended on the marksheet were forged. On the strength of these allegations, the FIR came to be registered and the IO seeks to arrest the petitioner in this case.

4. Learned counsel Shri Thakur vehemently and fervently opposed this pre-arrest bail application and urges that the petitioner does not deserve indulgence of pre-arrest bail.

5. On going through the case diary, it is apparent that all requisite steps of investigation have been undertaken from the petitioner who cooperated with the IO. The petitioner is a 73 years old lady. She has already completed the tenure as a Sarpanch. Thus, there appears to be no requirement of custodial investigation from the present petitioner.

6. Having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as available on record, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case to extend the benefit of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Jadav Kanwar W/o Shri Umrao Khan in connection with F.I.R. No.78/2019 registered at Police Station Bagra, District Jalore, the petitioner shall be released on bail; provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :-

(i). that the petitioner(s) shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii). that the petitioner(s) shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and

(iii). that the petitioner(s) shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top