SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1817

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Sandeep Mehta, J.
Bagta Ram - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11138/2021
Decided On : 02-09-2021

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. Vikram Sharma, P.P, for the Respondent

The court established that discrepancies in witness statements and the fulfillment of bail conditions under the NDPS Act can lead to the granting of bail even in serious drug-related offenses.

Headnote:

BAIL - NDPS ACT - The court granted bail to the petitioner, Bagta Ram, under Section 439 CrPC, emphasizing the discrepancies in witness statements and the satisfaction of conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which influenced the decision to allow bail despite the serious nature of the charges.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, Bagta Ram, was in custody for allegedly being involved in the possession of 8 quintal 39 kg 400 gm of contraband poppy straw found in a bus driven by another individual, Prema Ram. The investigation revealed conflicting statements regarding the ownership and control of the bus.

Finding of the Court:

The court noted discrepancies in the statements of the bus owner, Laxman Ram, regarding the transfer of the bus and the petitioner's involvement. The court found that the conditions for bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were satisfied.

Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted bail despite the serious charges under the NDPS Act and the implications of the evidence presented.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the inconsistencies in witness statements and the lack of direct evidence linking the petitioner to the contraband possession warranted the granting of bail.

Result: The bail application was allowed, and the petitioner was ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and sureties.

JUDGMENT

The instant bail application under Section 439 CrPC has been preferred by the petitioner Bagta Ram s/o Hanumana Ram Saran, who is in custody in connection with the F.I.R. No.66/2019 registered at the Police Station Mangalwad, District Chittorgarh for the offence under Section 8/29 of the NDPS Act.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

The recovery of contraband poppy straw weighing 8 quintal 39 kg 400 gm was effected from an unnumbered bus, which was driven by one Prema Ram. When interrogation was made from Prema Ram, he failed to offer any explanation for being in possession of the contraband poppy straw. He also did not name any person from whom the poppy straw had been procured. During the course of investigation, the police contacted the registered owner of the bus, namely, Laxman Ram, who gave a statement that he had sold the bus in question to one Suresh Bhai and that after the transfer, all responsibility of the bus was of the said person. Later on, the matter was given a twist and the petitioner was implicated in this case with the allegation of being the person in control of the bus in question as having been engaged to drive the same. Laxman Ram's subsequent statement was recorded by the Investigating Officer, in which he alleged that as a matter of fact, the petitioner had been engaged as driver of the bus in question and the agreement was issued in the name of Suresh Bhai Goswami on petitioner's instruction. However, the petitioner continued to hold control of the bus even thereafter. There is an apparent discrepancy in the two statements of Laxman Ram. The agreement of transfer of the bus was executed by Laxman Ram in favour of Suresh Bhai. This was precisely the reply given by Laxman Ram to the notice under Section 133 of the Motor Vehicle Act. This court is of the view that the conditions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act are satisfied in the present case.

In this background and having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 439 CrPC is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Bagta Ram S/o Hanumana Ram Saran arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.66/2019 registered at the Police Station Mangalwad, District Chittorgarh shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top