Back
DINESH MEHTA
Ramesh Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Petitioners were initially appointed on the post of LDC on different dates in or around year 1985, however, the respondents had not given the benefits of minimum pay grade to the petitioners for which they approached this Court by way of filing a writ petition being DB Civil Writ Petition No.2004/1987.
2. Petitioners' aforesaid writ petition came to be allowed by the Division Bench vide order dated 11.05.1988 and it was inter alia held that petitioners would be entitled to regular pay scale from the date of filing of the writ petition i.e. 13.08.1987.
3. Operative part of the judgment aforesaid reads thus :
10. In the result, the writ petition is allowed and we direct the respondents to pay the petitioners the minimum of pay scales of the regular recruited LDCs w.e.f. 13.08.1987 but without any increments. The petitioners are also entitled to corresponding Dearness Allowance and Additional Dearness Allowance if any payable thereon."
4. The judgment o
The court affirmed that established service entitlements must be honored, and deviations from prior judgments are not permissible.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioners were entitled to the regular pay scale from the date of filing of the writ petition and were also entitled to the benefits of ....
The main legal point established is that relief such as selection grade and special grade should be sought within a reasonable period of time, and lack of diligent pursuit of representations during s....
Employees must receive selection grade benefits based on their actual length of service from the date of initial appointment, in accordance with governmental policy.
Entitlement to service benefits and post-retiral benefits is determined based on the service record, consideration of penalty orders, and timely implementation of entitlements.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the petitioners to the specific pay scale as per the circular dated 25.1.1992, and the requirement for the respondents to implem....
When the appellant Board has given the benefit of first higher grade scale to some of the petitioners, at that juncture, such contention was not raised and at the time of granting the second higher g....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
