Back
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
J. Radhakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Govt. , Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to award Selection Grade in the scale of pay Rs.1320-30-1560-40-2040 from 01.06.1988 and Special Grade from 04.07.2000 in the scale of pay of Rs.5500-175-9000 in the cadre of Fitter Grade I (Time Keeper) and confer all the consequential benefits to the petitioner.)
1. The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the respondents to award selection grade in the scale of pay of Rs.1320-30-1560-40-2040 from 01.06.1988 and special grade from 04.07.2000 in the scale of pay of Rs.5500-175-9000 in the cadre of Fitter Grade-I (Time Keeper) and confer all the consequential benefits.
2. The writ petitioner has joined as Last Grade Government Servant on 13.07.1976 in the 4th respondent Training School on consolidated pay. Thereafter, he was brought under the regular establishment and appointed as Time Keeper on 04.07.1980 in the time scale of pay. The petitioner was awarded selection grade in the cadre of Time Keeper in the year 1990, for which, selection grade in the revised scale of pay was granted as Rs.1320/-, being non-promotion
The main legal point established is that relief such as selection grade and special grade should be sought within a reasonable period of time, and lack of diligent pursuit of representations during s....
Stale and belated claims cannot be entertained, and benefits as directed by a Full Bench order shall be extended only to parties before the Court, with no fresh writ petitions entertained after a spe....
The court's decision emphasized the principle that a petitioner cannot refer to a government order for the purpose of further revision of pension or other benefits after a significant lapse of time a....
The petitioner's claim for selection grade benefit and incorrect pensionary benefits was not justified based on the established legal principles of equality before the law.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that entitlement to selection grade and special grade is subject to completion of requisite years of service, and recovery orders issued within one....
The main legal point established is the inapplicability of G.O.Ms.No.216 to the petitioner due to delay and laches, and the determination that the petitioner, working in a private aided school, was o....
The concept of granting selection grade and special grade should not be tampered with and that teachers are either eligible for promotion or for Selection/Special Grade, not both.
Statutory authorities have a duty to consider representations made to them, and non-consideration amounts to dereliction of duty.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the eligibility for the revised scale of pay as per the Government letter dated 08.11.2010 based on the date of award of Selection Grade.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
