INDERJEET SINGH
Bank of Baroda Officers Union – Appellant
Versus
Bank of Baroda – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Heard on the application for vacation of the interim order dated 17.12.2020 filed on behalf of the respondent(s).
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers;
5), impugned circular bearing no. HO:BR:112/447 dated 02.12.2020 (ANNEXURE-6) and impugned circular bearing no. HO:BR:112/448 DATED 02.12.2020 (ANNEXURE-7), issued by respondents may kindly be quashed and set aside.
B. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the clause no. 4.1,4.2.1, 4.2.2 and clause no. 9.4.1, 9.4.2 and 9.4.3 of the impugned promotion policy dt. 02.12.2019 (ANNEXURE-4) may be quashed and set aside, being contrary to each other and being in violation of the Article 14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
C. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondent bank may be directed to make promotions to grade MMG/S-II, MMG/S-III and SMG/S-IV only after making appropriate provisions for converting the BOB GEMS grade into numerical numbers- % (percentage) for assessment of performance while carrying out the promotion exercise for the year 20
The court emphasized the importance of transparency and clarity in promotion policies to uphold constitutional rights to equality and fair treatment.
The court's decision was influenced by the need to balance the interests of the bank and account holders while allowing the respondent bank's application for vacation of the interim order.
The need for fair and objective consideration of representations in promotion cases, as directed by the court.
Employees entitled to notional promotion post-reinstatement if bank deviates from appellate court directions on disciplinary penalties.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.