SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1854

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
Sangeet Lodha, Mahendar Kumar Goyal, JJ.
Vishnu Bawaree - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors. - Respondents
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1613/2018
Decided On : 26-07-2021

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Dheeraj Palia for Mr. Ram Pratap Saini, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Prakhar Gupta for Dr. Vibhuti Bhushan Sharma, AAG, through VC, for the Respondent

The court affirmed that the state as an employer has the exclusive right to determine eligibility qualifications for recruitment, and judicial review cannot alter these stipulations.

Headnote:

Eligibility - Lecturer Recruitment - Rajasthan Education Service (Collegiate Branch) Rules, 1986 - The court upheld the prerogative of the state to prescribe qualifications for recruitment, emphasizing that equivalence of qualifications is a matter for academic experts, not the judiciary.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant sought to participate in an interview for a Lecturer position, claiming his MBA was equivalent to the required qualification in EAFM, which was contested by the RPSC.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the appellant did not meet the specific qualifications required for the post and that the equivalence of qualifications is not within the court's jurisdiction but rather the domain of academic experts.

Issues: Whether the appellant's MBA could be considered equivalent to the required qualification for the Lecturer position in EAFM.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the state has the authority to set eligibility criteria for recruitment, and the equivalence of qualifications is not a matter for judicial review.

Result: The intra-Court appeal is dismissed.

JUDGMENT

1. This intra-Court appeal is directed against order dated 4.12.18 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court, whereby the writ petition preferred by the appellant seeking directions to the respondents to allow him to participate in the interview for selection to the post of Lecturer in Economic Administration & Financial Management ('EAFM'), pursuant to the advertisement dated 12.1.15, issued by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission (RPSC), has been dismissed.

2. The RPSC invited applications from eligible candidates for recruitment to the post of Lecturer in various subjects, under the provisions of Rajasthan Education Service (Collegiate Branch) Rules, 1986 ('the Rules'). The eligibility qualification as prescribed in the advertisement was good academic record with Masters Degree in relevant subjects from an University or an equivalent degree from an accredited foreign university, National Eligibility Test (NET), conducted by University Grants Commission (UGC), CSIR or similar test accredited by the UGC like SLET/SET. The candidates who are or have been awarded a Ph.D. Degree in accordance with UGC (Minimum Standards and Procedure for Award of Ph.D. Degree) Regulations, 2009 were exempted from requirement of minimum eligibility condition of NET, SLET/SET for recruitment and appointment of Assistant Professor or equivalent positions in the Universities/Colleges/Institutions. NET/SLET/SET was also not required for such Masters Programmes in disciplines for which NET/SLET/SET is not conducted.

3. The appellant having the qualification of Masters in Business Administration (MBA), aspirant for appointment to the post of Lecturer in EAFM, filed a writ petition under the apprehension that on account of the eligibility qualification as prescribed, his application form for recruitment to the said post shall not be accepted by the respondent-RPSC.

4. Before the learned Single Judge, the appellant contended that since he has passed his MBA as also the NET Examination, he is eligible to be appointed on the post of Lecturer in the subject EAFM. Precisely, the case of the appellant was that MBA being a post-graduate degree in subject having a relation to Economics & Finance, it deserves to be considered equivalent to Post Graduation in EAFM.

5. On behalf of the RPSC, it was contended that the condition of eligibility for the post of Lecturer (EAFM) inter alia includes a Post Graduate qualification in subject with a good academic record as also NET/SLET/SET or Ph.D. in lieu thereof and therefore, the appellant who admittedly has not been Post Graduate in EAFM and does not also have NET/SLET/SET or Ph.D. therein, is not eligible for appointment to the post of Lecturer in EAFM. It was further contended that the issue of equivalence of MBA with the Post Graduate in EAFM is not a matter which can be adjudicated by this Court.

6. After due consideration of the rival submissions, the learned Single Judge opined that the subject of EAFM is distinct from MBA. Whether the two are equivalent, is not for the Court to address and adjudicate. The issue exclusively lies in the domain of expertise of concerned academic experts. Accordingly, the writ petition has been dismissed.

7. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant reiterating the arguments advanced before the learned Single Judge, submitted that the qualification of MBA has to be treated equivalent to the Masters in EAFM and thus, the appellant could not have been held ineligible to compete for appointment to the post of Lecturer in EAFM. Learned counsel submitted that the eligibility condition of NET/SET/Ph.D. and good acadmic record imposed by the respondents is also not in accordance with the norms of UGC.

8. We have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the appellant and perused the material on record.

9. Indisputably, the eligibility qualification prescribed for recruitment to the post of Lecturer in EAFM is Masters Degree in EAFM and the qualification of NET/SLET/

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top