PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Balu Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER
1. These writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India have been preferred claiming, in sum and substance, the following reliefs:
(ii) by an appropriate writ, order or direction, it may be declared that the entire land acquisition proceedings initiated pursuant to the notification dated 5.6.2012 have lapsed;
(iii) by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be restrained from taking possession of the land in question from the petitioners;
(iv) by an appropriate writ, order or direction, if during pendency of the writ petition, the respondents proceed to take physical possession of the land in question, then the same may kindly be directed to be restored back to the petitioners;
(v) any other appropriate order or direction, which this Hon?ble Court considers just and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case, may
Lajja Ram & Ors. Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh & Ors.
M/s. Usha Stud and Agricultural Farms Private Ltd. & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors.
Raghbir Singh Sehrawat Vs. State of Haryana & Ors.
Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition C.M.D.A. Vs. J. Sivaprakasam & Ors.
The Collector (Distt. Magistrate) , Allahabad & Anr. Vs. Raja Ram Jaiswal
V.K.M. Kattha Industries Private Limited Vs. State of Haryana & Ors
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.