SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1395

DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Nissar Mohd – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Lakshya Singh Udawat, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. Shrawan Bishnoi, P.P, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 361/2021, Police Station Raipur, District Pali, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 500, 384 of IPC and under Section 67-A of Information & Technology Act.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that prosecutrix 'S' was engaged with the accused-petitioner but due to some dispute, their engagement broke and it could not be converted into marriage; accused-petitioner has wrongly been implicated for the offence punishable under Sections 500, 384 of IPC and under Section 67-A of Information & Technology Act; accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 23.09.2021; no investigation and recovery is pending against the accused-petitioner; further investigation and trial will take time. With these submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently and fervently opposed the bail appl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top