SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1480

RAMESHWAR VYAS
Abdul Abid – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Bhagirath Ray Bishnoi, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. Laxman Solanki, P.P, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

The appellant has been convicted and sentenced as below vide Judgment dated 06.12.2019 passed by Special Judge, N.D.P.S. Cases (Additional Sessions Judge) Jaitaran, District Pali in Sessions Case No. 29/2016 (23/2014) :-

Offence

Sentences

Fine

Fine Default sentences

U/s 8/15 r/w 25 Section 25 & 29 of N.D.P.S. Act.

15 years R.I.

Rs.2,00,000/-

6 months

The appellant has moved this application under Section 389 Cr.P.C. seeking suspension of sentences awarded to him by the trial court.

Learned Public Prosecutor has not chosen to file reply to the application for suspension of sentences and proposes to argue the matter orally.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the impugned judgment and original record of the case.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the recovery of narcotic substance was not made from the possession of the appellant. He was convicted without any evidence on record. He further submits that as per the prosecution story, the narcotic substance was loaded at the behest of the appell

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top