RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Devendra Kachhawaha, J.
Mangalchand & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 883 of 2021 Criminal Miscellaneous Application For Suspension of Sentence No. 591 of 2021
Decided On : 01-10-2021
Suspension - NDPS Act - Section 8/18, Section 389 Cr.P.C. - The court interpreted the provisions of the NDPS Act regarding the quantity of drugs and the Cr.P.C. concerning suspension of sentences, allowing bail due to the non-commercial quantity and the age of the appellants.
Fact of the Case:
The appellants were convicted under the NDPS Act for possessing 500 grams of opium, which is below the commercial quantity. They sought suspension of their sentences after serving a short time in custody.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the quantity of drugs was below the commercial threshold and considered the age of one appellant, leading to the decision to suspend the sentences pending appeal.
Issues: Whether the sentences of the appellants should be suspended pending the appeal against their conviction under the NDPS Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the quantity of drugs being below commercial quantity and the appellants' lack of criminal antecedents warranted the suspension of their sentences.
Result: The application for suspension of sentence is allowed, and the appellants are released on bail.
JUDGMENT
Devendra Kachhawaha, J. - Heard learned counsel for the appellant-applicants as well as learned Public Prosecutor, on application for suspension of sentences.
2. By the instant application preferred under Section 389 Cr.P.C., applicant-appellants have craved for suspending the sentences handed down by learned Special Judge, NDPS Case Churu (for short, 'learned trial Court'), by its verdict dated 18.09.2021 in Sessions Case No.01/2009. Learned trial Court, by the aforesaid verdict, convicted the applicant-appellants for offences under Section 8/18 of the NDPS Act.
3. Arguing on the application for suspension of sentences, it is submitted by learned counsel that the accused appellants have convicted for the offence under Section 8/18 of the NDPS Act. The accused appellant Mangal Chand is 84 years of age. Learned counsel further submits that the accused appellant No.1 remained in custody for 02 months and 18 days and accused appellant Ramchandra remained in custody for 03 months and 16 days. Learned counsel further stated that as per the judgment itself, there were no criminal antecedents of the accused appellants and only 500-500 grms of opium has been recovered from the accused appellants, which is also below commercial quantity and the hearing of appeal will take time. Learned counsel for the appellants further submits that the accused appellants are behind the bar from the date of the judgment i.e. 18.09.2021. Learned counsel for the accused appellants, therefore prays that sentence of the accused appellants may be therefore suspended and it would not be appropriate to keep applicant-appellants under further incarceration.
4. Per contra learned Public Prosecutor has fervently and vehemently opposed the application for suspension of sentences and stated that offence was proved by the prosecution evidence and, therefore, the accused appellants were convicted.
5. Having regard the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the recovered quantity is below commercial quantity and the hearing of appeal may take time, I feel inclined to accept this application for suspension of sentence.
6. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the sentences passed by learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Churu, vide judgment dated 18.09.2021, in Sessions Case No.01/2009 against appellant-applicants (1) Mangal Chand S/o Late Devji and (2) Ramchandra S/o Late Maga Ramji, shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and they shall be released on bail, provided they execute personal bond in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- each with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.1,00,000/-each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance in this Court on 08.11.2021 and whenever ordered to do so till disposal of the appeal, on the conditions indicated below:-
2. That if the applicants change the place of residence, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.
3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.
7. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of accused-applicants in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused- applicants were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purposes relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant does not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.
The court established that possession of drugs below commercial quantity, along with other mitigating factors, can justify the suspension of sentences.
The court established that in cases involving possession of narcotics below commercial quantity, the suspension of sentence may be granted, especially when the accused has been compliant with bail co....
The court established that under Section 389 Cr.P.C., a convicted individual may be granted bail pending appeal if the circumstances, including the nature of the offense and prior convictions, suppor....
The court has the discretion to suspend sentences and grant bail during the pendency of an appeal, considering the facts and circumstances of the case.
Suspension of sentence should be considered liberally unless there is any statutory restriction, and the appellate Court has the discretion to suspend a sentence awarded under the NDPS Act, emphasizi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of the delay in the disposal of the appeal as a ground for the grant of relief of suspension of sentence, along with the relaxati....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to suspend sentences under Section 389 Cr.P.C. when the appellant has strong grounds for assailing the impugned judgment and ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of prolonged custody and the likelihood of serving out the sentences awarded by the trial court in granting bail and suspending t....
The court applied Section 389 Cr.P.C. to suspend the sentences of the appellant-applicant during the pendency of the appeal, considering the provisions of the NDPS Act and the overall facts and circu....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.