RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
Inderjeet Singh, J.
Kashish Prajapati - Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. - Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13275/2021
Decided On : 26-11-2021
Writ - Admission - Article 226 - The court interpreted the validity of OBC (NCL) certificates and the requirements for admission, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the guidelines set by the competent authority.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, an eligible candidate for OBC (NCL) category, challenged the denial of admission based on the issuance date of her OBC certificate, which was valid until 01.01.2022, despite being issued before the required date.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the OBC certificate issued to the petitioner was valid and should have been accepted for admission, as it was endorsed by the competent authority and the petitioner had submitted a fresh certificate.
Issues: Whether the OBC (NCL) certificate issued to the petitioner prior to 01.04.2021 was valid for admission purposes under the applicable guidelines.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the OBC certificate was valid until 01.01.2022 and that the respondents failed to consider the valid documentation provided by the petitioner.
Result: The writ petition is allowed, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner for admission under the OBC (NCL) category.
JUDGMENT
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
a) By an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents may kindly be directed to consider OBC Certificate of the petitioner as valid and accordingly change the category of the petitioner from General to OBC category and petitioner may be allowed to take part in subsequent round of counseling as per schedule including Central Seat Allocation Board (CSAB 2021) under OBC category and finally allot seat under OBC category preferably with VNIT Nagpur or any other nearest place.
b) Any other relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper be also passed in favour of the petitioners."
2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner being an eligible candidate for OBC (NCL) category appeared in JEE (Main) 2021 exam and secured 94.4855 marks against cut off 68.23 marks and the petitioner in the Round-I was allocated seat in VNIT Nagpur, thereafter, she uploaded her documents on 30.10.2021 and 31.10.2021 she received mail from JOSAA Portal that her OBC (NCL) certificate has been issued prior to 01.04.2021 and according to the norms of the Business Rules for JOSAA, the OBC (NCL) certificate must be issued after 01.04.2021 whereas, the OBC (NCL) certificate of the petitioner has been issued on 13.01.2021 by the Competent Authority. Hence, this writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging action of the respondents in not giving admission to her according to her category i.e. OBC (NCL).
3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a meritorious candidate and she secured 94.4855 marks against cut off 68.023 marks. Counsel further submits that OBC (NCL) certificate has been issued by the Competent Authority on 13.01.2021 which is valid for one year i.e. upto 01.01.2022, a copy of the same is also placed on record i.e. (Annexure-3) of the writ petition. Counsel further submits that the petitioner has also informed the respondents about the valid OBC (NCL) certificate. Counsel further submits that there is no fault on the part of the petitioner and according to the State Government guidelines the certificate issued is valid for the period of one year. Counsel further submits that the petitioner again submitted the fresh OBC (NCL) certificate issued by the Competent Authority before the Admission Board on 03.11.2021 (Annexure-7) which confirms that the OBC (NCL) certificate of the petitioner was issued on 03.01.2021, lastly prayed for allowing the writ petition.
4. In support of his contention counsel relied upon the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of 'Ram Kumar Gijroya v. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board & Anr., reported in (2016) 4 Supreme Court Cases 754.
5. Counsel for the respondents has opposed the writ petition and submitted that according to the Business Rules for Joint Seat Allocation for the Academic Programs, the requirement is that OBC (NCL) certificate must be issued after 01.04.2021 and prayed for dismissal of the writ petition.
6. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.
7. Admittedly, a girl candidate who belongs to backward class i.e. OBC (NCL) category secured much higher marks than last cut off marks and her admission was denied by the respondents on the ground that her OBC (NCL) certificate was not issued after 01.04.2021 whereas her certificate was valid upto 01.01.2022 as endorsed by the Competent Authority and she uploaded her documents on 30.10.2021 alongwith a document showing that her certificate is valid upto 01.01.2022 and when the respondents have not considered her OBC (NCL) certificate, then she represented the Admission Board and also submitted the fresh OBC (NCL) certificate issued by the Competent Authority on dated 03.11.2021.
8. The wr
The court established that valid OBC (NCL) certificates must be recognized for admission, regardless of the issuance date, if they meet the validity period set by the competent authority.
Non-compliance with prescribed eligibility criteria results in disqualification from consideration for public sector appointments.
Timely submission of valid documents is crucial in establishing eligibility for OBC (NCL) category in recruitment processes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for candidates to possess valid OBC-NCL certificates within the specified timelines as per the advertisement and subsequent notice ....
The insistence on OBC-NCL certificates issued within a specified timeframe is arbitrary and lacks rational nexus to reservation objectives, infringing constitutional guarantees.
Administrative authorities are bound by existing notifications granting relaxations for the production of mandatory recruitment documents. Denying such policy-based benefits to a candidate, thereby c....
Strict compliance with admission requirements is essential; failure to submit valid documentation within specified timeframes results in rejection.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.