Mohd. Akhtar Ansari vs State - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 1330

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1330

SANDEEP MEHTA, SAMEER JAIN
Mohd. Akhtar Ansari – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Radheyshyam Mankad, Advocate, R.R.Chaparwal, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sandeep Mehta, J. - The appellant herein has been convicted and sentenced as below vide judgment dated 27.6.2019 passed by the learned Special Judge, POCSO Act, 2012 and Child Rights Protection Commission Act 2005, No.1, Udaipur in Special Sessions Case No.117/2018:

Offences Under Section
Sentences	Fine	Fine Default sentences
363 IPC	3 Years' R.I.	Rs.3,000/-	1 month's S.I.
366 IPC	5 Years' R.I.	Rs.3,000/-	1 month's S.I.
6 of POCSO Act	10 Years' R.I	Rs.5,000/-	2 months' S.I.
3(2)(v) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act	Life imprisonment	Rs.10,000/-	2 months' S.I.
All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. Being aggrieved of his conviction and sentences, the appellant has preferred the instant appeal under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C.

3. Briefly stated facts relevant and essential for disposal of the appeals are noted hereinbelow:-

4. Jhamku (P.W.10) submitted a written report (Ex.P17) to the S.H.O. P.S. Nai, District Udaipur on 27.10.2015 alleging inter-alia that she had gone out to the Avari Mata Temple on 24.10.2015 with her family members. Her younger daughter Sushri P (hereinafter to be referred to as '

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1330

SANDEEP MEHTA, SAMEER JAINMohd. Akhtar Ansari – AppellantVersusState – Respondent

SANDEEP MEHTA, SAMEER JAIN
Mohd. Akhtar Ansari – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent