RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Devendra Kachhawaha, J.
Rakesh - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1129/2021
Decided On : 17-12-2021
SUSPENSION - NDPS ACT - The court allowed the suspension of the sentence for the accused-petitioner convicted under Section 8/18 of the NDPS Act, emphasizing that the quantity of contraband was below commercial limits and the petitioner had been on bail during the trial. The court's decision was influenced by the need for fairness in the appeal process and the absence of opposition to the facts presented regarding the quantity of the recovered substance.
Fact of the Case:
The accused-petitioner was convicted under Section 8/18 of the NDPS Act for possessing 450 grams of opium, which is below the commercial quantity threshold. The petitioner was on bail during the trial and sought suspension of the sentence pending appeal.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the case warranted suspension of the sentence due to the nature of the offense, the quantity of contraband involved, and the fact that the petitioner had been on bail throughout the trial.
Issues: Whether the sentence awarded to the accused-petitioner should be suspended pending the appeal, considering the quantity of contraband and the circumstances of the case.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the suspension of the sentence was justified as the quantity of the contraband was below the commercial threshold, and the accused had complied with bail conditions during the trial.
Result: The application for suspension of sentence was allowed, and the petitioner was ordered to be released on bail, subject to certain conditions.
ORDER
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the record.
2. Admit. Issue notice.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor accepts notice, hence, notice need not be issued.
4. Heard learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor on application for suspension of sentence (SoS No. 759/2021).
5. Learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner stated that the accused-petitioner was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 8/18 of the NDPS Act by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Pratapgarh, Rajasthan in Special Sessions Case No. 38/2021 vide judgment dated 11.11.2021 with a fine ofRs.20,000/-; that in the present case, as per prosecution, 450 grams of opium have been recovered which is below commercial quantity; that during the trial of the case, the accused-petitioner was on bail; that hearing of the appeal will take time, therefore, sentences awarded to the accused-petitioner may kindly be suspended till final disposal of the appeal.
6. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer for suspending the sentences awarded to the accused-petitioner but he does not controvert the facts that the recovered quantity of the contraband in question is below commercial quantity and the accused-petitioner was on bail during trial as per record.
7. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of the petitioner and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentences awarded to the accused-petitioner.
8. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence (SoS No. 759/2021) filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the sentences passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Pratapgarh, Rajasthan vide judgment dated 11.11.2021 in Special Sessions Case No. 38/2021 against the petitioner-applicant Rakesh S/o Rameshwar Rawal, shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Judge for his appearance in this Court on 17.01.2022 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-
2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.
3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.
9. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant(s) does not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.
The court established that in cases involving possession of narcotics below commercial quantity, the suspension of sentence may be granted, especially when the accused has been compliant with bail co....
The court established that under Section 389 Cr.P.C., a suspension of sentence can be granted when the accused meets certain conditions, including the nature of the offense and the circumstances surr....
The court established that possession of drugs below commercial quantity, along with other mitigating factors, can justify the suspension of sentences.
Possession of small quantities of contraband under the NDPS Act is bailable, allowing for suspension of sentences.
Suspension of sentence granted due to contraband being below commercial quantity and appellants' prior bail status, with conditions for bail and appearance.
The court established that under Section 389 Cr.P.C., a convicted individual may be granted bail pending appeal if the circumstances, including the nature of the offense and prior convictions, suppor....
The court has the discretion to suspend sentences and grant bail during the pendency of an appeal, considering the facts and circumstances of the case.
The court applied Section 389 Cr.P.C. to suspend the sentences of the appellant-applicant during the pendency of the appeal, considering the provisions of the NDPS Act and the overall facts and circu....
The court may suspend a sentence if the accused demonstrates that the contraband is below commercial quantity and was on bail during trial.
The court has the discretion to suspend a jail sentence under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, based on the circumstances and evidence presented.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.