JUDGMENT

Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - At risk and cost of learned counsel for the appellants, service of notice upon respondent No. 2 (owner) is dispensed with.

2. With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the matter is being heard and disposed of finally.

3. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellants against the Judgment and Award dated 28.06.2019 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sumperpur, Dist. Pali, in MACT Claim Case No. 92/2016 whereby, the appellants-claimants were awarded a sum of Rs. 20,74,750/- on account of the death of Bhanwar Singh in the accident which occurred on 02.07.2016.

4. The learned Tribunal after framing the issues, evaluating the evidence on record and hearing learned counsel for the parties decided the claim petition of the appellants-claimants.

5. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

6. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the finding of Tribunal on Issue No. 2 is erroneous on the ground that despite there being four documents on record viz. Ex.P-6 Inspection Report of dead body, Ex.P-7 Panchnama of dead body, Ex.P-8 Memo of delivery of dead body and Ex.P-18 Post-Mortem Report showing the age of the deceased to be 40