Narendra Kumar vs State - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 2285

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2285

VIJAY BISHNOI
Narendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Suryadeep Bishnoi, Advocate, Shrawan Bishnoi, Advocate, Umesh Kant Vyas, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

2. The petitioner(s) has/have been arrested in FIR No.131/2021 of Police Station Rajiasar, Distt. Sri Ganganagar for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 376(2)(N) IPC. He/she/they has/have preferred this/these bail application(s) under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that allegation of sexual assault, levelled against the petitioner, is absolutely false. It is further submitted that the complainant is major and she went with the petitioner on her own free will. It is argued that in relation to the said incident, a missing person report was lodged at the instance of complainant's brother, in which, the complainant had appeared before the IO and specifically stated that she went with the petitioner on her own free will and he did not do anything wrong with her. It is argued that again on 22.6.2021, the complainant along with her brothers had appeared before the SHO, PS Rajiasar and reiterated the same facts, however later on, on 30.7.2021, the complainant under pressure of her family members, has lodged this false FIR against the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document