SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2273

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Vijay Bishnoi, J.
Kanhaiyala - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16037 of 2021
Decided On : 20-12-2021

Advocates appeared:
Vikram Singh Rajpurohit, Advocate, Mool Singh Bhati, Advocate

The court established that the presence of evidence indicating a consensual relationship and the age of the prosecutrix at the time of the complaint are significant factors in determining bail in sexual assault cases.

Headnote:

[BAIL] - [SEXUAL ASSAULT] - [The court granted bail to the petitioner accused of sexual assault under Section 376 IPC and Section 5/6 of the POCSO Act, considering the evidence of a consensual relationship and the prosecutrix being a major at the time of the complaint, while emphasizing the need for a fair trial.]

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was arrested for alleged sexual assault under FIR No.73/2021. The petitioner claimed the allegations were false, asserting a consensual relationship with the prosecutrix, who was pressured by her family to file the complaint.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the evidence presented, including letters and chats, suggested a consensual relationship. The prosecutrix was of legal age at the time of the complaint, and the trial was expected to take time.

Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted bail considering the nature of the allegations and the evidence of a consensual relationship.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the totality of circumstances, including the evidence of consent and the prosecutrix's age, warranted the granting of bail without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.

Result: The bail application was allowed, and the petitioner was directed to be released on bail upon executing a personal bond and providing sureties.

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

2. The petitioner(s) has/have been arrested in FIR No.73/2021 of Police Station Dungla, Chittorgarh, Distt. Chittorgarh for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 376 IPC and Section 5/6 of the POCSO Act. He/she/they has/have preferred this/these bail application(s) under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that allegation of sexual assault, levelled against the petitioner, is absolutely false. It is argued that prosecutrix and the petitioner were in relationship from last so many years and decided to solemnize marriage, however, when family members of the prosecutrix came to know about their relationship, they pressurized the prosecutrix to lodge a false complaint against the petitioner. Learned counsel while inviting my attention towards the documents i.e. letters, whatsapp chats and photographs, exchanged in-between the petitioner and the prosecutrix, which are annexed with the charge-sheet, has submitted that from the said evidence, it is clear that relationship between the prosecutrix and the petitioner was consensual. It is further submitted that at the time of filing of the complaint, the prosecutrix was major; charge-sheet has been filed and trial of the case is likely to take time.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner(s) under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

6. Accordingly, this/these bail application(s) filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is/are allowed and it is directed that petitioner(s) ? Kanhaiyalal @ Kishan Lal S/o Shri Bheru Lal Ahir shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.73/2021 of Police Station Dungla, Chittorgarh, Distt. Chittorgarh provided he/she/they execute(s) a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his/her/their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top