SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2273

VIJAY BISHNOI
Kanhaiyala – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Vikram Singh Rajpurohit, Advocate, Mool Singh Bhati, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

2. The petitioner(s) has/have been arrested in FIR No.73/2021 of Police Station Dungla, Chittorgarh, Distt. Chittorgarh for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 376 IPC and Section 5/6 of the POCSO Act. He/she/they has/have preferred this/these bail application(s) under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that allegation of sexual assault, levelled against the petitioner, is absolutely false. It is argued that prosecutrix and the petitioner were in relationship from last so many years and decided to solemnize marriage, however, when family members of the prosecutrix came to know about their relationship, they pressurized the prosecutrix to lodge a false complaint against the petitioner. Learned counsel while inviting my attention towards the documents i.e. letters, whatsapp chats and photographs, exchanged in-between the petitioner and the prosecutrix, which are annexed with the charge-sheet, has submitted that from the said evidence, it is clear that relationship between the prosecutrix and the petitioner was consensual. It is furt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top