Back
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Shekhar Patona – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J. - In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of all concerned.
2. This Court perused the material available on record.
3. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.183/2021 of Police Station Jhalarapatan, District Jhalawar for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 307, 149 IPC. They have preferred these bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the charge-sheet in this case has already been filed. Learned counsel also pointed out that all the seven injuries caused in this case are simple in nature.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.
6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the fact that conclusion of the proceedings is likely to take some time and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
7. Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is di
The court established that bail can be granted under Section 439 Cr.P.C. when the nature of the injuries is simple and the proceedings are likely to be prolonged, ensuring a fair balance between the ....
The court established that bail can be granted under Section 439 Cr.P.C. when the circumstances of the case, including witness statements and the duration of custody, justify such a decision.
The court established that the duration of custody and the filing of a charge-sheet are critical factors in deciding bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
The court established that bail can be granted under Section 439 Cr.P.C. when the circumstances of the case, including the absence of allegations and prolonged custody, justify such a decision.
The court established that prolonged custody without prior criminal history and the existence of a cross case can justify the granting of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the totality of the facts and circumstances, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.
The court established that under Section 439 Cr.P.C., bail may be granted when the duration of custody is excessive and the trial is expected to take a significant amount of time.
The court may grant bail to an accused petitioner based on the totality of the facts and circumstances, the grant of bail to similarly situated persons, and the filing of the charge-sheet, without ex....
The court established that in bail applications, the duration of custody and the nature of the charges are critical factors, and mere allegations without substantial evidence do not justify continued....
The court's decision to grant bail was based on the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, the filing of the charge-sheet, and the likelihood of the proceedings taking some time.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
