Back
ARUN BHANSALI
Amita – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arun Bhansali, J. - This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved against the order of posting, whereby the petitioner has been accorded posting at Govt. Primary School, Jakheda, Khandela, Sikar.
2. Submissions have been made that several posts are lying vacant in District ? Jhunjhunu, which vacant posts were not reflected in Shala Darpan by the respondents, depriving the petitioner from opting for the said schools.
3. In the circumstances of the case, the petitioner may make a detailed representation to the respondents raising all the grievances as raised in the present writ petition.
4. If such a representation is made by the petitioner alongwith the copy of the writ petition as well as this order, the Competent Authority is directed to decide the representation by way of a speaking order within a period of three weeks from the date the same are filed by the petitioner.
5. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
The legal principle established is that administrative authorities must ensure transparency and provide a fair opportunity for individuals to address grievances regarding postings.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's power to issue a mandamus to direct the respondent authorities to decide the petitioner's representation on medical grounds expeditious....
The court's decision was influenced by the specific provision of Rule 24 of RSR and previous judgments, which supported the petitioner's request for relief.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
