SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2387

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Parasram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Kumud Singh, Advocate, Mangal Singh Saini, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J. - In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of all concerned.

2. This Court perused the material available on record.

3. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.174/2021 of Police Station Hindoli, District Bundi for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(N) IPC and Section 5/6 of POCSO Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court towards the statement rendered by the prosecutrix under Section 161 Cr.P.C. in which the prosecutrix has stated that she is 16 years 07 months of age and she was in consistent contact with the present petitioner, as they were speaking on mobile phone. Learned counsel further submits that the prosecutrix has further stated that the petitioner called her on mobile phone and when she refused, the petitioner took her away on his motorcycle and committed rape upon her. Learned counsel also has further drawn the attention of this Court to the statement rendered by the prosecutrix under Section 164 C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top