SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2404

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Devendra Kachhawaha, J.
Kamlesh - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 10047 of 2021
Decided On : 17-08-2021

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Naveen Kishore Rastogi, for the Appellant; Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan, P.P, for the Respondent.

Bail can be granted under Section 439 Cr.P.C. with specific conditions to protect the interests of the complainant, especially in cases involving financial disputes.

Headnote:

BAIL - JUDICIAL CUSTODY - The court granted bail to the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C., emphasizing the need for a special condition requiring the petitioner to deposit the full amount owed to the complainant within one month. The court acknowledged the lengthy trial process and the petitioner's willingness to comply with the condition, thereby allowing bail while ensuring the complainant's interests were protected.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner is in judicial custody since 19.07.2021, facing charges under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC, with the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Finding of the Court:

The court considered the arguments from both sides and decided to grant bail, provided the petitioner deposits the full amount owed to the complainant within one month.

Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted bail considering the circumstances of the case and the conditions proposed by both parties.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the lengthy trial process justified granting bail, contingent upon the petitioner fulfilling the condition of depositing the owed amount, thus balancing the rights of the accused and the interests of the complainant.

Result: The bail application was allowed with conditions, requiring the petitioner to furnish a personal bond and surety bonds, and to deposit the full amount owed to the complainant within one month.

ORDER

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 84/2021, Police Station Shakkargarh, District Bhilwara, registered for the offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Heard and considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that offences are triable by the Magistrate; petitioner is behind the bars since 19.07.2021. He further prayed that the petitioner may be granted conditional bail and for the purpose, the petitioner is ready to deposit the full amount towards complainant within a period of one month and in case, if he fails to do so, the prosecution shall be free to file application for cancellation of bail. With these submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has seriously opposed the bail application and stated that an amount of Rs.36,500/- has been taken from the complainant and the same has not been deposited by the accused-petitioner. Learned Public Prosecutor further requested to impose special condition that bail may be granted with the condition that counsel for the accused-petitioner undertakes to deposit full amount within a period of one month and if the same is not deposited, the prosecution shall be free to file application for cancellation of bail.

5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly to the facts that if the accused-petitioner undertakes that he shall deposit full amount in the bank account of the complainant as per the rules within a period of one month from today, as mentioned above; and that the trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted subject to the special condition that if the full amount towards complainant is not deposited by the petitioner within the stipulated period of one month from today, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file application seeking cancellation of present bail.

6. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Kamlesh S/o Shri RamchandraVaishnav, arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 84/2021, Police Station Shakkargarh, District Bhilwara, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

7. It is made clear that if the full amount is not deposited by the accused-petitioner within the stipulated period of one month from today, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file application seeking cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top