RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
Chandra Kumar Songara, J.
Shubam - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors. - Respondents
Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3217 of 2021
Decided On : 09-06-2021
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - INVESTIGATION - The court dismissed a petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. challenging the police investigation and negative final report regarding allegations against the petitioner. The court emphasized that it would not interfere with completed investigations and upheld the principle that the petitioner could raise objections to the final report in the competent court.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner/complainant filed a petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. against the police investigation concerning allegations made in F.I.R. No. 583/2020, which included offences under Sections 323, 341, and 504 of IPC. The petitioner claimed ongoing medical issues and requested a fresh medical examination and a fair investigation.
Finding of the Court:
The court noted that the investigation was completed, and a negative final report was submitted. It referenced a previous case where similar circumstances led to the conclusion that the court would not interfere with the investigation process once completed.
Issues: Whether the court should exercise its powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to order a fresh investigation and medical examination after a negative final report was submitted.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that it would not interfere in the investigation process once it was completed and a negative final report was submitted, reinforcing the principle that objections to such reports should be raised in the competent court.
Result: The petition was dismissed, and the stay application was also disposed of.
ORDER
Defect Nos. 3,4,5 & 6, pointed out by the Office stand waived due to Covid-19 Situation.
1. Instant petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been preferred on behalf of petitioner/complainant assailing the investigation being conducted by the Police authorities with regard to allegations against the petitioner No.2, namely Nagendra Singh @ Santy levelled in F.I.R. bearing No.583/2020 registered at Police Station, Nagar District Bharatpur for offences punishable under Sections 323, 341 and 504 of I.P.C.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/complainant submits that the petitioner is still facing prolonged difficulties for which he is undergoing treatment and despite many requests made by him with the Police personnel as also with the Superintendent of Police, Bharatpur but he has not been medically examined again. Counsel further submits that Police filed a Final Report in negative form in the matter as F.R. No.259 dated 15.12.2020. Counsel contends that this Court has ample powers to make order under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to get the petitioner medically examined and can also direct for fair and impartial investigation by any of the Superior Officer of the Police. Counsel prays that this petition may be accepted, so the complainant/ petitioner may get the ends of justice.
3. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/complainant.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/ complainant as well as learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and perused the material made available on record.
5. A Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Nirmala Devi (Smt.) Vs. State of Rajasthan through P.P. and Others, reported in 2020 (3) Cr.L.R. (Raj.) 1116, in Para 8, held as under :-
6. In the present case, investigation has already been completed and a Final Report in negative form has been submitted before the Court of competent jurisdiction, this Court is of the opinion that there is no need to exercise the power under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and direct for afresh investigation again in the matter.
7. Resultantly, instant petition has no force and is hereby dismissed.
Stay application also stands disposed of.
AI
The court affirmed that once an investigation is completed and a negative final report is submitted, it will not exercise its powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to order a fresh investigation.
No interference is called for when a Special Investigation Team has been constituted for the investigation.
The main legal point established is that allegations reflecting a continuous offence may not be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., and the court's inherent jurisdiction may not be invoked in such cas....
Matrimonial offences can be treated as continuous, allowing for cognizance beyond the standard limitation period under Section 468 Cr.P.C.
The court emphasized the importance of fair investigation in accordance with the law, based on precedent law and the assurance given by the Public Prosecutor.
The court established that the right to a fair investigation is a fundamental aspect of the criminal justice system, necessitating the consideration of all relevant evidence by the investigating auth....
The protection of life and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is paramount and cannot be compromised.
The court ruled that only the Appropriate Authority or authorized officers can investigate and file complaints under the PC&PNDT Act, prohibiting police involvement in such cases.
The duty-bound obligation of police officers to conduct expedient investigations.
The court established that inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can be invoked to quash FIRs when a compromise is reached and verified, aligning with the principles set forth in Gian Singh Vs. S....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.