SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1993

PANKAJ BHANDARI
Laxmi Narayan – Appellant
Versus
Satate of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Anil Agrawal for Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan, for the Appellant; Mr. Hem Singh, Mr. F.R. Meena, PP, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. Petitioners have preferred this misc petition praying therein that the compromise may be attested and the petitioners be acquitted for offence under Sections 326 & 326/34 of IPC.

2. It is contended by counsel for the accused-petitioners that there was a cross FIR filed way back in October, 2000. In cross FIR, compromise was arrived at and the proceedings were dropped. In the present FIR also, compromise arrived at between the parties and the same was produced before the Court below and Court has compounded the offence under Section 323, 341 & 323/34 is of IPC, but as the offence under Sections 326 & 326/34IPC were non-compoundable, the same were not compounded. The Trial Court has convicted the present appellants. It is also contended that the appeal against the said judgement and sentence is pending before the Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Hindaun City, District Karauli (Raj.)

3. Counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on Ramgopal & Anr. Vs The State of Madhya Pradesh, Criminal Appeal No.1489/2012 which was decided by the Apex Court.

4. Complainant alongwith his counsel and injured are present in Court and they have not disputed the fact that parties have entered

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top