SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 285

NAVNEET KUMAR
Lakhan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Shailesh, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Tapas Roy, A.P.P., Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocate

ORDER :

I.A. No. 4045 of 2020 and I.A. No. 4046 of 2020

1. Learned counsel Mr. Shailesh is present on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel Mr. Prashant Kumar is present on behalf of the opposite party No. 2. Learned counsel for the State is also present.

2. It is jointly submitted on behalf of the petitioner and on behalf of the opposite party No. 2 that one I.A. No. 4046 of 2020 has been filed jointly on behalf of the petitioner as well as the opposite party No. 2 stating therein that both the parties have resolved their dispute amicably.

3. The learned counsel for the parties have submitted that both the parties have entered into a compromise by resolving their dispute amicably once and for all willingly and voluntarily.

4. It has been pointed out that Section 380 is not compoundable in nature but since both the parties have entered into a compromise and the genesis of the dispute is purely private in nature and it has not affected the society at large, therefore, in the interest of justice, let this Cr.M.P. be allowed in terms of the compromise of settlement by quashing C.P. Case No. 1351 of 2002 under which the summons had been issued. The learned counsels appearing on behal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top