RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Devendra Kachhawaha, J.
Man Singh - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1068/2021
Decided On : 20-12-2021
Suspension - Criminal Proceedings - IPC Sections 408, 420, 468, 471, 120-B - The court discussed the provisions of IPC regarding theft, cheating, forgery, and conspiracy, emphasizing the conditions for bail and suspension of sentences, ultimately allowing the suspension based on the circumstances of the case.
Fact of the Case:
The accused-petitioner was convicted under multiple sections of the IPC and sought suspension of his sentence while appealing the conviction. The trial court had maintained one conviction while setting aside others.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the offences were triable by a Magistrate, the petitioner had been on bail during the trial, and had been incarcerated since December 2021, warranting the suspension of the sentence.
Issues: Whether the application for suspension of sentence should be granted based on the circumstances of the case.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the conditions for suspension of sentence were met, considering the nature of the offences, the petitioner's prior bail status, and the time required for the revision petition's hearing.
Result: The application for suspension of sentences was allowed, and the petitioner was granted bail.
ORDER
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned
2. Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
3. Admit. Issue notice.
4. Learned Pubic Prosecutor accepts notices on behalf of the respondent - State of Rajasthan. Hence, notices need not be issued.
5. Send for the record.
6. Heard learned counsel for the parties on application seeking suspension of sentence (SoS No. 318/2021).
7. Learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner stated that the accused-petitioner was convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 408 IPC for a period of three years' simple imprisonment with a fine of Rs.20,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo three months additional simple imprisonment, under Section 420/120-B IPC for a period of three years' simple imprisonment with a fine of Rs.20,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo three months additional simple imprisonment, under Section 468/120-B IPC for a period of three years' simple imprisonment with fine of Rs.20,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo three months additional simple imprisonment, under Section 471/120-B IPC for a period of two years' simple imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 10,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo additional one month simple imprisonment by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.l, Jalore vide judgment and order dated 23.01.2012 in Original Criminal Case No. 237/1998 (24/1994). Learned counsel also stated that on filing of the appeal, the conviction under Section 468, 420, 471, 120-B IPC was set aside by the learned Sessions Judge, Jalore vide judgment and order dated 06.12.2021 in Criminal Appeal No. 23/2021 (CIS No. 115/2014) however, the conviction of the accused-petitioner under Section 408 read with Section 120-B IPC was maintained; that the alleged offences are triable by the Magistrate; that during the trial of the case, the accused-petitioner was on bail; that hearing of the revision petition will take time, therefore, it has been prayed that the application seeking suspension of sentences may kindly be allowed and the accused-petitioner may be kindly be enlarged on bail.
8. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application seeking suspension of sentences (SoS No. 318/2021). However, he does not wish to file reply to the application.
9. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly to the facts that the alleged offences, under which the accused-petitioner was convicted, are triable by the First Class Magistrate; that during the trial of the case, the accused-petitioner was on bail; that the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 06.12.2021; that hearing of the revision petition will take, therefore, the application seeking suspension of sentences may kindly be allowed and the petitioner may kindly be enlarged on bail.
10. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentences (SoS No. 318/2021) filed under Section 397(1) Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.l, Jalore in Regular Criminal Case No.237/1998 (24/1994), vide judgment and order dated 23.01.2012, as modified and affirmed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jalore vide judgment and order dated 06.12.2021 in Criminal Appeal No. 23/2021 (CIS No. 115/2014) against applicant-petitioner, Man Singh S/o Bheem Singh, shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid revision and he shall be released on bail upon his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this Court on 21.01.2022 and whenever ordered to do so, till disposal of the revision on the conditions indicated below:-
2. That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he will give i
The court established that suspension of sentence can be granted when the accused meets specific conditions, including prior bail status and the nature of the offences.
The court established that a convicted individual may have their sentence suspended if they were previously on bail and the trial process is prolonged.
The court has the discretion to suspend the sentence and grant bail under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. based on the facts and circumstances of the case.
The court established that suspension of sentences is appropriate when the offense is triable by a Magistrate and delays in the revision process are anticipated.
The court may suspend a sentence if the petitioner meets certain conditions, including prior bail status and compliance with legal obligations.
The court has the discretion to suspend substantive sentences under Section 389 Cr.P.C. based on the arguments and facts of the case.
The court may suspend a substantive sentence and grant bail if there is no imminent hearing for the revision application, ensuring fair treatment of the accused.
The court may suspend a sentence if the accused are on bail and the appeal process is expected to take a significant amount of time.
The court may suspend a substantive sentence if there is no timely hearing of the revision application, ensuring the accused's rights are protected during prolonged custody.
The court may suspend a substantive sentence if there are no immediate prospects for hearing a revision, subject to specific bail conditions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.