SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 576

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
NAGENDRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAAJSTHAN – Respondent
SOSA / 171 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Umesh Kant Vyas, Mr. Deepak Choudhary, GA cum AAG, Mr. Kuldeep Singh Kumpawat

The court may suspend a sentence if the accused are on bail and the appeal process is expected to take a significant amount of time.

Headnote:

(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 389 - Suspension of sentence - The appellants were on bail during the trial, and the hearing of the appeal is expected to take time - The court finds it appropriate to suspend the sentence awarded to the accused appellants. (Paras 1-3)

(B) Conditions for suspension - The court imposed conditions for the suspension, including the requirement for personal bonds and regular appearances before the trial court. (Paras 4-6)

Facts of the case:
The appellants applied for suspension of their sentence, arguing that they were on bail during the trial and that the appeal process would be lengthy.

Findings of Court:
The court allowed the application for suspension of sentence, subject to the execution of a personal bond and compliance with specified conditions.

Issues: The main issue was whether the sentence should be suspended given the appellants' bail status and the anticipated duration of the appeal process.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the circumstances warranted the suspension of the sentence, emphasizing the importance of the appellants' bail status and the expected delay in the appeal process.

Result: Application for suspension of sentence allowed.

Judgment :

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants were on bail during the trial and hearing of the appeal will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the sentence of the appellants may be suspended.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer for suspension of sentence.

4. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of the appellants and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case including the facts that the appellants were on bail during the trial and hearing of the appeal is likely to take time, therefore, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused appellants.

5. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 430 BNSS (Section 389 Cr.P.C.) is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by learned Additional Session Judge, Begun, District Chittorgarh vide judgment dated 17.01.2025 in Session Case No.32/2024 against the appellant- applicants – 1. Nagendra Singh S/o Dev Sudarshan Singh, 2. Bhuralal S/o Girdhari Lal and 3. Bherulal S/o Ghisalal shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this court on 17.03.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicants change the place of residence, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

6. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicants in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused- applicants were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicants do not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top