HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
NAGENDRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAAJSTHAN – Respondent
SOSA / 171 / 2025
(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 389 - Suspension of sentence - The appellants were on bail during the trial, and the hearing of the appeal is expected to take time - The court finds it appropriate to suspend the sentence awarded to the accused appellants. (Paras 1-3)
(B) Conditions for suspension - The court imposed conditions for the suspension, including the requirement for personal bonds and regular appearances before the trial court. (Paras 4-6)
Facts of the case:
The appellants applied for suspension of their sentence, arguing that they were on bail during the trial and that the appeal process would be lengthy.
Findings of Court:
The court allowed the application for suspension of sentence, subject to the execution of a personal bond and compliance with specified conditions.
Issues: The main issue was whether the sentence should be suspended given the appellants' bail status and the anticipated duration of the appeal process.
Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the circumstances warranted the suspension of the sentence, emphasizing the importance of the appellants' bail status and the expected delay in the appeal process.
Result: Application for suspension of sentence allowed.
Judgment :
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants were on bail during the trial and hearing of the appeal will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the sentence of the appellants may be suspended.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer for suspension of sentence.
4. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of the appellants and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case including the facts that the appellants were on bail during the trial and hearing of the appeal is likely to take time, therefore, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused appellants.
5. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 430 BNSS (Section 389 Cr.P.C.) is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by learned Additional Session Judge, Begun, District Chittorgarh vide judgment dated 17.01.2025 in Session Case No.32/2024 against the appellant- applicants – 1. Nagendra Singh S/o Dev Sudarshan Singh, 2. Bhuralal S/o Girdhari Lal and 3. Bherulal S/o Ghisalal shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this court on 17.03.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-
1. That they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.
2. That if the applicants change the place of residence, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.
3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.
6. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicants in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused- applicants were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicants do not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.
The court may suspend a sentence if the accused are on bail and the appeal process is expected to take a significant amount of time.
The court allowed the suspension of sentence pending appeal based on the absence of custody and prior temporary suspension, imposing conditions for bail.
The court may suspend a sentence if the appellant was on bail during trial and there is no imminent hearing of the appeal.
The court may suspend a sentence pending appeal if the appellant was previously on bail and the appeal process is expected to be lengthy.
The court may suspend a sentence pending appeal if justified by the circumstances, subject to compliance with specified bail conditions.
Suspension of sentence under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is warranted when appellants were on bail during trial and appeal hearing is not imminent.
The court may suspend a substantive sentence and grant bail if there is no imminent hearing for the revision application, ensuring fair treatment of the accused.
The court may suspend a sentence if the petitioner meets certain conditions, including prior bail status and compliance with legal obligations.
Suspension of sentence justified when appellant on bail during trial and contraband is below commercial quantity, emphasizing lengthy appeal process.
The court has the discretion to suspend substantive sentences under Section 389 Cr.P.C. based on the arguments and facts of the case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.