Lrs of Adreem vs District Collector - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 1929

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1929

DINESH MEHTA
Lrs of Adreem – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Moti Singh Through Cisco Webex App, for the Appellant; Mr. Amit Mehta Through Cisco Webex App, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. By way of present writ petition, petitioners have challenged the order dated 17.03.2021, whereby the District Collector, Jalore-revisional authoirty has vacated the ad-interim order granted by him on 23.12.2020.

2. The petitioners herein had preferred a Revision Petition No.33/2020 under Section 97(2) of Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 laying challenge to the Patta dated 28.01.1990, granted in favour of the respondents.

3. After hearing the submissions of the petitioners, the revisional authority namely District Collector, Jalore passed an ad-interim order on 23.12.2020 requiring the respondents to maintain status quo in relation to possession and record of the subject land.

4. On 17.03.2021 the revisional authority however, vacated the aforementioned ad-interim order.

5. Mr. Moti Singh, learned counsel submitted that the impugned order dated 17.03.2021 passed by the District Collector is illegal and in violation of principles of natural justice. He submitted that no sooner were the notices served than the respondents appeared before the revisional authority and prayed for vacation of the ad-interim order dated 23.12.2020.

6. Learned counsel argued that neither any reply was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document