SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2136

ARUN BHANSALI
Onkarnath – Appellant
Versus
Lrs of Gangaram – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Dalip Singh Rajvi, for the Appellant.

ORDER

1. This appeal is directed against judgment and decree dated 17.11.2018 passed by Additional District No.1, Bikaner (?the first appellate court?), whereby, the appeal filed by the respondents against the judgment and decree dated 13.11.2007 has been allowed and the decree for specific performance passed by the trial court has been set aside.

2. The suit for specific performance was filed by the appellant ? plaintiff inter alia with the submissions that respondent ? Gangaram was in requirement of Rs.35,000/- for his personal and household expenses and, therefore, for the agriculture land comprising in Khasra No.594 admeasuring 11.34 hectare, an agreement to sale dated 14.5.2001 was entered into and it was agreed that the sale deed would be executed in five months. When the defendant was required to get the sale deed registered, he started avoiding and on 3.11.2001 refused. It is claimed that the plaintiff was ready and willing to purchase the stamps and pay the registration fees and, therefore, prayed that sale deed be got registered in his favour and the possession of the land be handed over to him.

3. Written statement was filed denying the execution of the agreement. It was cl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top