Back
NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Suresh Chand – Appellant
Versus
Mansingh (Deceased), Smt Lajjo – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's claim for specific performance. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. trial court's issues and plaintiff's arguments. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. citations and counterarguments regarding readiness. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's review and decision on trial court's finding. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. court's final decree and direction. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT :
Narendra Singh Dhaddha, J.
1. Instant appeal filed by the appellant-plaintiff (for short 'the plaintiff') against the judgment and decree dated 15.03.2002 passed by Additional District Judge, Dholpur in Civil Suit No. 53/91, whereby the suit for specific performance of contract filed by the plaintiff was dismissed.
2. Brief facts of the case are that plaintiff filed a suit on 03.12.90 for specific performance of contract in which plaintiff mentioned that a written agreement to sell dated 24.08.87 was executed by the respondent-defendant (for short 'the defendant') in favour of the plaintiff for selling his agricultural land as mentioned in the agreement to sell and in para No. 1 of the suit. The plaintiff had paid Rs.1,00,000/- to the defendant and remaining Rs.10,000/- was said to be paid upto 24.08.89. The plaintiff was always ready and
The court affirmed that the plaintiff was ready and willing to perform the agreement to sell, and time was not the essence of the contract, leading to the dismissal of the defendants' appeal.
The burden of proof on the defendant to disprove the existence of the agreement and the inadmissibility of evidence on a plea not raised in the pleadings.
For specific performance, a claimant must prove their readiness and willingness to execute the agreement; failure to appear on the scheduled date undermines the claim.
In a suit for specific performance, the plaintiff must prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform the contract, supported by evidence of ownership and financial capability.
The agreements of sale and corresponding deed were valid, with the court confirming that allegations of fraud were not substantiated.
A party asserting a right to specific performance must prove readiness and willingness to perform their contractual obligations.
Agreement to Sell – Continuous willingness on part of plaintiff is condition precedent to grant relief of specific performance.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
