SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2073

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
Mr. Akil Kureshi, Uma Shanker Vyas, JJ.
Mali Ram Hindala & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
The State of Rajasthan & Ors. - Respondents
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 307 of 2021 and Connected with D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15064 of 2020
Decided On : 13-12-2021

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Vigyan Shah with Mr. Harendra Neel Mr. Tanveer Ahamad, for the Appellant; Mr. S.S. Raghav, AAG, Mr. Prakhar Gupta on behalf of Dr. V.B. Sharma, AAG, Mr. Nitin Jain, Mr. Neeraj Batra, for the Respondent.

The UGC Regulations of 2018 must be adhered to by the State Government in recruitment processes, as they provide broader eligibility criteria than previous regulations.

Headnote:

Regulations - Recruitment - UGC Regulations 2018 - The court emphasized that the UGC Regulations of 2018 expanded eligibility criteria for Assistant Professors, mandating adherence by the State Government, which was found to have deviated from these regulations in its recruitment process.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioners challenged the State Government's failure to follow UGC Regulations of 2018 for Assistant Professor recruitment, arguing that the State's criteria were inconsistent with the expanded eligibility defined by the UGC.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the State Government's reliance on the previous UGC Regulations of 2010 was impermissible, as the UGC Regulations of 2018 had been adopted with modifications that included broader eligibility criteria.

Issues: Whether the State Government's recruitment criteria for Assistant Professors contravened the UGC Regulations of 2018 and whether the petitioners were eligible under these regulations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the UGC Regulations of 2018, which expanded eligibility criteria, must be followed by the State Government, and any deviation from these regulations was illegal.

Result: The petitions were disposed of with directions for the State Government to assess the petitioners' qualifications under UGC Regulations of 2018.

JUDGMENT

1. These petitions arising out of similar facts have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. For convenience facts may be noted from Civil Writ Petition No.307/2021. The grievance of the petitioners is that the State Government has not followed the UGC guidelines contained in its Regulations dated 18.07.2018 in relation to the recruitment for the post of Assistant Professor advertised by the Rajasthan State Public Service Commission on 18.12.2020.

2. The petitioners seek appointment on the post of Assistant Professor Botany or Zoology as the case may be. They point out that earlier regulations of UGC called UGC Regulations on Minimum Qualifications For Appointment Of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in Universities And Colleges and Measures For the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education, 2010 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the UGC Regulations of 2010') recognised only Master's degree in the relevant subject as the eligibility condition. The UGC however superseded these UGC Regulations of 2010 by UGC Regulations on Minimum Qualifications For Appointment Of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in Universities And Colleges and Measures For the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education, 2018 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the UGC Regulations of 2018') which were promulgated vide notification dated 18.07.2018. In such regulations, for the post of Assistant Professor eligibility criteria laid down. Relevant portion of which reads as under:-

    'I. Assistant Professor: Eligibility (A or B):

A.

i) A Master's degree with 55% marks (or an equivalent grade in a point-scale wherever the grading system is followed) in a concerned/relevant/allied subject from an Indian University, or an equivalent degree from an accredited foreign university.'

3. The petitioners would thus point out that under the UGC Regulations of 2018 the eligibility criteria for appointment to the post of Assistant Professor by way of direct recruitment is Master's degree with 55% marks or equivalent in concerned/relevant/allied subject from an Indian or an accredited foreign university. This is in contrast to the previous UGC Regulations of 2010 where the Master's degree in relevant subject alone was recognised as essential eligibility criteria. Thus, the UGC Regulations of 2018 expand the eligibility criteria from the candidates holding Masters Degree in relevant subjects to all candidates holding Masters Degree in concerned/relevant/allied subjects. This would essentially widen the zone of consideration and make the competition for recruitment more stiff.

4. Learned advocates for the petitioners pointed out that the State Government has adopted these Regulations subject to certain modifications. Our attention was drawn to a circular dated 01.10.2018 issued by the Government of Rajasthan sanctioning revision of existing pay scales for teaching staff of the Government colleges in terms of the UGC Regulations of 2018. In this circular it has been provided as under:-

    '14.Notwithstanding anything contained in this order, the Revised Pay (UGC) shall be subject to the condition that the relevant provisions of Ordinance/Statutes etc of University in regard to qualification, mode of recruitment / appointment to different posts, grant of annual increments / conditions of eligibility for senior and selection scales of Assistant Professor etc. shall be amended with effect from 01.01.2016 strictly in conformity with the guidelines contained in Government of India, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of Higher Education, New Delhi letter No.F.1-7/2015-U.II (1) dated 02.11.2017 as amended from time to time and University Grants Commission Regulations (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education) 2018 immediately after their issuance except age of superannuation and full pension i.e. 50% of average pay

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top