THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
VIJAY BISHNOI, SUMAN SHYAM
Shreemoye Bordoloi W/o Dr. Surajit Konwar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Suman Shyam, J.
Heard Mr. M. K. Choudhury, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. M. Dutta, learned counsel appearing for the writ appellants. We have also heard Mr. K. Gogoi and Mr. S. Das, learned Standing Counsel, Higher Education Department, Government of Assam. Mr. Ritwick Bhuyan, learned counsel has appeared on behalf of Mr. A. Chamuah, learned Standing Counsel for the UGC.
2. This intra court appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 21.06.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge disposing of three writ petitions viz., WP(C) No.1040/2022, WP(C) No.2100/2022 and WP(C) No.2515/2022 raising a common grievance before the court. The three appellants in the instant Writ Appeal were amongst the 7 writ petitioners in WP(C) No.2100/2022 and have approached this Court by filing the present Writ Appeal assailing the judgment and order dated 21.06.2022 arising out of WP(C) No.2100/2022 on several grounds, as enumerated in the memorandum of appeal.
3. The facts of the case lie in a narrow compass. The present appellants and the writ petitioners in WP(C) No.1040/2022 as well as WP(C) No.2515/2022 all claim to be Masters degree hold
Kalyani Mathivanan vs. K. V. Jeyaraj & others
Kalyani Mathivanan vs. K. V. Jeyaraj & others
Gambhirdhan K. Gadvi Vs. State of Gujarat & others, (2022) 5 SCC 179
UGC regulations are mandatory for UGC-funded institutions but directory for State-run institutions unless formally adopted.
The court established that while UGC guidelines mandate department-wise reservation, the existing state rules are not unconstitutional and do not require amendment based solely on the petitioners' cl....
The UGC Regulations of 2018 must be adhered to by the State Government in recruitment processes, as they provide broader eligibility criteria than previous regulations.
Point of Law : UGC regulations - There was no provision in the M.G. University Law for fixing the tenure of appointment of Principals as deemed to be permanent nature.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the 2010 Regulations provide for the counting of previous regular service for the purposes of grant of benefits under CAS, without making a....
Point of Law : Irrespective of whether the University Acts under Entry 25 of List III or the Statutes framed there under are amended in line with the UGC Regulations or not, in view of its adoption b....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.