SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1531

FARJAND ALI
Dharampal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Rakesh Matoria, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Mukesh Trivedi, PP and Mr. Rajendra Choudhary, Advocate, for the Respondent. Mr. Vijay Kumar, Police Inspector, P.S. Pilibanga, Hanumangarh, Present-in-Person.

Judgement Key Points

Certainly. Based on the provided legal document, here are the key points:

  1. The court emphasized the importance of resolving conflicting medical opinions in criminal investigations through the appointment of a Medical Board to ensure accurate findings and justice (!) (!) .

  2. The case involved a victim who initially sustained injuries classified as dangerous to life, but subsequent medical opinions contradicted this, labeling the injuries as simple, leading to conflicting reports and a corruption case against the examining doctor (!) (!) .

  3. The conflicting medical reports created ambiguity regarding the nature of the injuries, prompting the court to order a new examination by a Medical Board to clarify the facts and uphold the integrity of the investigation (!) (!) .

  4. The orders of the lower courts denying the Medical Board examination were quashed, and directions were issued to the authorities to constitute a Medical Board within 10 days, ensuring the complainant's presence for the examination (!) .

  5. The court underscored that the investigation's primary goal is to uncover the truth, and in cases of conflicting medical opinions, a Medical Board's examination is essential for a fair and accurate determination of the injury's nature (!) .

  6. The court directed the Superintendent of Police to ensure the complainant's availability for the Medical Board examination and authorized coercive measures if necessary to facilitate a fair process (!) .

  7. The petitions filed by both the accused and the State were allowed, leading to the quashing of the previous orders and the issuance of new directions for medical examination (!) .

  8. The court also disposed of stay petitions, ensuring that the process for the Medical Board examination proceeds without delay (!) .

Please let me know if you need further analysis or assistance regarding this case.


ORDER

1. The Investigating Officer is present in person before this Court along with the case diary of FIR No.346/2022 of P.S. Pilibanga. He apprised to this Court that when the complainant Rajat Kumar was examined by the Medical Officer, it was opined by him that the injuries sustained by the complainant were dangerous to life.

2. Subsequent to this, when the accused of this FIR approached the concerned Medical Officer seeking explanation regarding the nature of injury, the opinion for which had already been given by him; the Doctor unashamedly and contrary to his first opinion, gave a second opinion for the same injury to be simple in nature. The act of the doctor made a hue and cry in between the parties as well as the Investigating Agency and in this meantime, a case under the prevention of corruption Act got lodged against him and he was caught red handed while taking illegal gratification from the accused of this case. In the matter pertaining to prevention of corruption, the Doctor has been charge-sheeted.

3. In this view of the matter since there were two contrary reports on record, with a view to wipe out the ambiguous situation, the superior Officers deemed it appropriate to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top