SARAL SRIVASTAVA
Ankit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. R.S. Umrao, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding respondents to conduct his re-medical examination for the post of Constable in Uttar Pradesh Police/Constable, Civil Police, and Constable P.A.C. Direct Recruitment 2018.
3. The brief facts of the case are that a notification dated 16.11.2018 was published by the U.P. Recruitment and Promotion Board, Lucknow inviting applications for recruitment of 49,568 posts for U.P. Police/Constable, Civil Police and Constable, P.A.C. Direct Recruitment 2018.
4. Pursuant to the aforesaid advertisement, the petitioner submitted an online application for being considered for appointment on the post of Constable in U.P. Police. The petitioner was called to appear in the physical efficiency test for the post of Constable in U.P. Police at 8th Batallion P.A.C. Bareilly in which he was found fit.
5. Thereafter, the documents of the petitioner relating to his qualification were checked and verified by the Recruitment Board. Subsequently, the petitioner was called for
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.