Back
NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Chandra Ram Gurjar – Appellant
Versus
Ismail – Respondent
ORDER
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 23.08.2011 passed by Motor Accident Claim Tribunal and Additional District and Sessions Judge (F.T.) No.2, Beawar, District Ajmer (for short 'the tribunal'), whereby a sum of Rs.3,50,700/-has been awarded as a compensation alongwith interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant-claimant (for short 'the claimant') submitted that the tribunal has committed an error in awarding lesser compensation. Learned counsel for the claimant also submitted that as per permanent disability certificate, the claimant had received 80% permanent disability on account of amputated injury but the tribunal wrongly considered 40% of disability. Learned counsel for the claimant also submitted that claimant was doing milk dairy business and his income was 25000/- per month. Learned counsel for the claimant also submitted that the tribunal has awarded lesser amount towards the pain and suffering and towards the future medical treatment. So, order of the tribunal be modified.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents has opposed the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the claima
The court established that evidence of income can be validated through oral testimonies despite lacking formal documentation, and defined functional disability as critical for compensation in persona....
Compensation for permanent disability must reflect updated income metrics and consider the severity of injuries when determining adequate amounts for pain and suffering.
Calculation of future income and compensation in motor accident claims.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for just and reasonable compensation in motor accident claims, taking into account all elements that would place the victim in a position ....
It is a matter of record that Tribunal considered permanent disability of the body as a whole to extent of 90% and assessed compensation under head of loss of future income
Compensation for permanent disability must adequately reflect the injured party's needs, including full income consideration and costs for necessary assistance.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the assessment of compensation in motor accident claims based on the extent of injuries and the claimant's inability to work.
Compensation in personal injury cases must reflect actual economic losses and disabilities, correctly assessing income and functional impairment based on evidence.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
