SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Guj) 348

HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
Mehulkumar Ghanshyambhai Patel – Appellant
Versus
Prajapati Mulagiri Goswami – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Hiren M. Modi.
For the Defendants : Mr. H.S. Munshaw, Ms. Lilu K. Bhaya.

JUDGMENT :

1. This is an appeal by the appellant-original claimant, challenging the judgment and award, Dated: 15.05.2008, passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxiliary), Fast Track Court No.2, Vadodara (‘the Tribunal’, herein after), in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 1230 of 2003, whereby, the Tribunal partly allowed the said claim petition and awarded total Rs.1,87,000/- towards compensation, along with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum, from the date of filing of the claim petition, till realization so also proportionate costs.

2. Learned Advocate, Mr. Modi, appearing for the appellant-claimant mainly submitted that the Tribunal committed an error, while calculating the income of the appellant-claimant by overlooking the relevant documents, though, the same were produced before it.

2.1 It was submitted that, though, the appellant-claimant produced the salary certificate, Exhibit-33, issued by the TVS Motors and he also examined the concerned person, i.e. owner of Jay Ambe Automobiles, who was authorized service provider for the TVS Motors, as a witness v

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top