SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1437

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Daya Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. H.S. Shrimali, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. S.K. Meher, PP, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. Instant misc. petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. have been filed by the petitioners for quashing the chargesheet No. 01/2021 presented before the court of learned Special Judge NDPS Cases, Bikaner and learned Additional Sessions Judge No.1, Bikaner respectively.

2. The police registered a FIR on 04.05.2021 against accused persons for offence under Section 8/22 of NDPS Act in relation to recovery of contraband tramadol hydrochloride tablets. On the basis of information under Section 27 of Evidence Act, police detained the petitioners. After completion of investigation, the police filed chargesheet against the petitioners on 11.08.2021.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the police had seized the contraband and sent sample to FSL for chemical examination and presence of narcotic substance. However, as per report of FSL, the sample tablets gave positive test for the presence of Chlorpheniramine but the presence of Tramadol could not be detected in the sample tablets and that Chlorpheniramine is not listed under NDPS Act. Thus, it is prayed that further proceedings against the petitioners are liable to be dropped and the chargesheet is also liable to be quashed q

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top