SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1449

SAMEER JAIN
Rukma – Appellant
Versus
Phooma @ Choti – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Arvind Gupta, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Rakesh Kumar Trivedi, Advocate for Mr. Vinay Pal Yadav, Advocate, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. By way of present petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 27.03.2017. The relevant portion of which is reproduced herein-below:

2. Services in the instant matter is complete.

3. Vide order dated 04.08.2017, interim protection was granted and further proceedings in the court below were directed to be stayed.

4. The principal plea raised by learned counsel for the petitioner is that as per the provisions of Section 35 of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and pari materia provisions of Section 39 of Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1998, any document which is inadequately stamped is required to be impounded for realization of appropriate stamp duty by the Collector Stamps. In this regard, the petitioner had filed one application on 18.02.2017 but the learned court below has exceeded its jurisdiction and has given finding on the fact that even if the document in question is stamped, still it is not mandatory on the part of the trial court to admit the same in evidence. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the learned court below is duty bound to abide by the provisions of Section 35 of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and pari materia provision of Section 39 of Rajasthan Stamp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top