SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 374

VISHAL MISHRA
Mukesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Kulvinder Singh (dead) through its legal heirs Jaspreet Kaur – Respondent


Advocates:
Anand Bhardwaj for petitioner;
Sameer Kumar Shrivastava for respondents No. 1 and 2.

ORDER

Mishra , J. -- 1. The present petition is being filed challenging the order dated 2.4.2018, whereby the learned trial Court has calculated the deficit stamp duty to be paid upon the document i.e. agreement to sell dated 15.7.2013 and despite the petitioner arguing the fact that he does not want to tender the said agreement to sell in evidence, the learned trial Court has sent the same to the Collector for impounding. It is pointed out that the civil suit for specific performance of agreement to sell and for permanent injunction with respect to the property as mentioned in para 1 of the plaint was filed by the petitioner-plaintiff. The defendant No.1 and 2, who happens to be the husband and wife have executed an agreement to sell on 15.7.2013 for consideration of Rs.2,50,000/- per bigha and received advance of Rs.5,00,000/- vide cheque No.957126 & 957127 in presence of witnesses. The sale deed was executed in the month of December, 2013 and after execution the remaining consideration amount was to be paid, but despite of several requests, no heed was paid by the defendants No.1 and 2. A notice was issued by the plaintiff on 2.1.2014 showing his readiness and willingness for exe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top