Nearly Decade-Long Delay in Patnitop Illegal Construction PIL Appalls J&K&L High Court; Directs PDA CEO to Join Proceedings
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Employees Under CCS Pension Rules Excluded from PG Act Section 2(e) Gratuity: Delhi HC Upholds Forfeiture on Resignation
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Orders No-Fault Vaccine Compensation Policy
11 Mar 2026
Delhi Sessions Court Upholds Conviction Under Sections 354, 354A IPC on Victim's Sole Reliable Testimony Despite No CCTV
11 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Seeks Dileep Response in 2017 Assault Appeal
11 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR
HIRDESH
Dinesh Kushwah – Appellant
Versus
G.C. Dairy India Limited Through Director Rajendra Singh S/o Shri Jwala Singh – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
ORDER :
HIRDESH, J.
This petition and M.P. 3776/2024 are being decided together, as both are interrelated to each other.
2. Both the petitions were filed by petitioners/plaintiffs under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the impugned orders dated 22/05/2024 and 05/07/2024 passed by the 15 District Judge, Gwalior in civil suit No 400001A/2015 (RCSA).
3. Brief facts of the case is that petitioners/plaintiffs filed a civil suit for specific performance of agreement to sale dated 30/05/2014 against respondents/defendants with pleading that on 30/05/2014, respondent No.1 entered into agreement to sale with petitioners for sale of his land which is in question for consideration of Rs. 3,15,000/- per Bigha, as the land in question is agricultural land, therefore, respondent No.2/State Government was arrayed proforma defendant in
Trial Court must adhere to statutory procedures under the Indian Stamp Act regarding document admissibility and impounding instruments for insufficient stamp duty.
The trial court must adhere to the provisions of the Indian Stamp Act and the Rajasthan Stamp Act regarding the impounding of inadequately stamped documents and cannot exceed its jurisdiction by addr....
A document admitted in evidence cannot be questioned for insufficiency of stamp duty, but courts have a mandatory duty to impound such documents regardless of any objections raised.
Once a document is admitted in evidence, it cannot be questioned later for insufficient stamping under Section 36 of the Indian Stamp Act.
No limitation exists for filing stamp duty adjudication applications as per Indian Stamp Act provisions.
Once an instrument is admitted in evidence without objection, it cannot subsequently be held to be inadmissible on the ground of being insufficiently stamped, as per Section 36 of the Indian Stamp Ac....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article