MUNNURI LAXMAN, PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Nathu Lal, S/o. Unkar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.
1. The instant criminal appeals have been preferred under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. claiming, in sum and substance, the following reliefs :
2. Since both the instant criminal appeals arise out of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 31.10.2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Women Atrocities Cases), Bhilwara (‘Trial Court’), in Sessions Case No. 24/2012 (State of Rajasthan Vs. Nathu Lal and Anr.), therefore, the appeals have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.
2.1. Vide the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence, the accused-appellants have been convicted and sentenced as below :
| Conviction under Section(s) | Sentence(s) | Fine(s) |
| 120-B IPC | Life Imprisonment | Rs.15,000/- (each of the accused-appellants) in default, each of the accused |
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda Vs. State of Maharashtra
Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra
Laxman Prasad v State of Madhya Pradesh
In criminal cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must establish a complete chain of evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
A conviction based on circumstantial evidence requires a complete chain of evidence that excludes all reasonable hypotheses of innocence.
The court ruled that circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing the need for corroboration and the benefit of doubt for the accused.
For a conviction based on circumstantial evidence, each link in the chain must be established beyond reasonable doubt; failure to do so warrants acquittal.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of circumstantial evidence, including the 'last seen theory', recovery of the body from exclusive possession, and the significance ....
Convictions under circumstantial evidence require a complete and unbroken chain of proof; mere suspicion is insufficient for establishing guilt.
In a murder conviction based on circumstantial evidence, multiple corroborative factors, including the last seen theory and absence of alternative explanations, can establish guilt beyond reasonable ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.