IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
FARJAND ALI, J.
Nikhilesh Katara, S/o Shri Chhagan Lal Katara and Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary, Ayurved, Yoga And Naturopathy Medicine, Unani, Siddha And Homeopathy (Ayush) Department and Ors. - Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4255 Of 2024 Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4489 Of 2024, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4505 Of 2024, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4858 Of 2024, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4869 Of 2024
Decided On : 24-09-2024
ARBITRARY - RECRUITMENT SELECTION - The court addressed the legality of the provisional select list for the TSP area, determining that the bonus marks awarded to Yoga Instructors were contrary to Rule 19 of the Rajasthan Ayurveda Service Rules, 1966. The court concluded that the petitioners were not entitled to bonus marks for their experience as Yoga Instructors, as it did not align with the qualifications for the Ayurveda Nurse/Compounder position, thus upholding the integrity of the selection process.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners challenged the provisional select list for the post of nurse junior grade, claiming it was arbitrary and included improper bonus marks for Yoga Instructors contrary to established rules.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioners were entitled to experience certificates for their work but not to bonus marks for Yoga Instructor experience, as it was not relevant to the Ayurveda Nurse/Compounder position. The court upheld the previous ruling regarding the inapplicability of bonus marks.
Issues: Whether the provisional select list was arbitrary and whether the bonus marks awarded to Yoga Instructors were lawful under Rule 19 of the Rajasthan Ayurveda Service Rules, 1966.
Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the experience of Yoga Instructors does not equate to the qualifications required for the Ayurveda Nurse/Compounder role, and thus, the awarding of bonus marks was not justified.
Result: The writ petitions were disposed of in accordance with the previous judgment, affirming that the petitioners were not entitled to bonus marks and that the provisional select list would stand as valid.
ORDER :
(Farjand Ali, J.) :
1. These writ petitions have been preferred by the petitioners with the following prayers :-
b) That respondents concerned may be directed to issue a fresh select list with the names of the petitioners incorporated at the relevant serial numbers and they may be offered appointment on the post of nurse junior grade according to their merit.
c) That it may be declared that the bonus marks given to the Yoga Instructors may be declared contrary to the provision of Rule 19 of the Rajasthan Ayurveda Service Rules, 1966 and selection in this recruitment made by providing bonus marks for the experience of Yoga instructors may be declared bad and illegal and liable to be quashed and set aside.
d) That if during pendency of the writ petition the final select list after verification of the documents is issued providing the bonus marks to be selected candidates then the same may quashed and set aside and the appointments made in pursuance of the final select list on such basis may be quashed and set aside.
e) Any other order or direction which may deemed just and proper kindly is passed in favour of the petitioners.
2. Since in a batch of petitions connected with a writ petition being S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17062/2023, the issue has been dealt elaborately and decided by this Court on 24.09.2024 which covers the pleading raised and relief claimed in the instant writ petition, therefore, no further order is required to be passed.
3. For convenience, the operative part of the order dated 24.09.2024 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17062/2023 is being reproduced as under: -
A. The petitioners are entitled to get the experience certificate of the work they performed during the relevant period but for the experience on the post of Yoga Instructors only. They shall be able to use the same as and when it is required for that purpose. Since, the experience certificate has been issued by the department under the direction of this Court, therefore no further order is to be passed in this regard. If the experience certificate to any of the candidates hasn’t been issued yet despite the order of this Court, then it shall be issued to those candidates immediately. The interim order dated 01.11.2023 is made absolute hereby.
B. The petitioners are not entitled to get the benefit of bonus marks in accordance with the order dated 25.04.2023 issued by the department of Medical and Health as the same is not applicable to the case of the petitioners.
C. The nature and kind of the work of Yoga Instructors is different to the work of Ayurveda Nurse/Compounder and therefore the petitioners are not entitled to raise the claim of their work experience as Yoga Instructors akin to the post of Ayurveda Nurse/Compounder.
D. If the State Government specifies any bonus marks as provided under Rule 19 of the Rajasthan Ayurvedic, Unani, Homeopathy and Naturopathy Subordinate Service Rules, 1966, then the bonus marks shall be awarded to the candidates as per the applicability of the order and the work discharged by the candidates."
4. In this view of the matter, the present writ petitions as well as stay petitions are also disposed off in the light of the judgment passed in the cases referred supra.
5. No order as to cost.
The court established that experience in a different role (Yoga Instructor) does not qualify for bonus marks in a recruitment process for a distinct position (Ayurveda Nurse/Compounder) under the app....
The court established that the nature of work must be similar for bonus marks eligibility, and distinct departmental rules govern the recruitment processes.
Bonus marks under Rule 19 of the Rajasthan Medical and Health Subordinate Services Rules, 1965 can only be granted to persons working on temporary/ ad-hoc basis or on contractual basis or through pla....
Entitlement to bonus marks under the Rajasthan Medical and Health Subordinate Service Rules, 1965 and the interpretation of the same in light of relevant case law.
A litigant cannot claim distinction from a judicial decision relied upon for relief; subsequent judgments affecting the basis of entitlement invalidate previous claims.
The experience certificate for services rendered outside the state cannot be considered for appointment and awarding bonus marks in a different state.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.