Back
FARJAND ALI
Sonu @ Avinash Yadav, S/o. Shri Kanwar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP – Respondent
ORDER :
(Farjand Ali, J.) :
1. The jurisdiction of this court has been invoked by way of filing the instant fourth bail application under Section 439 CrPC at the instance of accused-petitioner. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:
| S.No. | Particulars of the Case |
| 1. FIR Number | 250/2020 |
| 2. Concerned Police Station | Gangashahar |
| 3. District | Bikaner |
| 4. Offences alleged in the FIR | Section 302 of the IPC |
| 5. Offences added, if any | - |
| 6. Date of passing of impugned order | 16.03.2024 |
2. Brief facts of the case are that on 12.11.2020 the complainant Lal Singh Yadav submitted a written report to the SHO, RAC Police Center, Gangashahar, Bikaner alleging inter alia that on pervious night i.e. on 11.11.2020 at about 11:00-11:30 p.m. Aarif visited his house and told him that a quarrel took place with Sonu Yadav in the mines, whereupon he immediately rushed there and saw that Nitin was lying dead and his head was crushed; two boys namely Nakul Yadav and Saurabh Yadav were present there. It was further stated in the report that when the complainant reached at the spot he asked Aarif regarding unfortunate incident, who told him tha
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right, and prolonged detention without trial is a violation of personal liberty.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and prolonged pre-trial detention without a timely trial is a violation of this right.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and prolonged detention without trial is a violation of this right.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and prolonged pre-conviction detention without trial is unjust and infringes upon the accused's right....
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, and prolonged detention without trial is impermissible.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, and prolonged detention without trial is a violation of this right.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, and prolonged detention without trial is impermissible.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21, and prolonged detention without trial is impermissible.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, and prolonged detention without trial is unjustifiable.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right, and prolonged incarceration without trial violates this right, justifying bail.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
