MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Avtar Singh S/o Gurbhachan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.246/2020 of Police Station Padampur, District Sriganganagar for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 147, 148, 149, 447, 430-A read with Section 120-B of IPC. He has preferred this third bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. (Section 483 BNSS).
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that upto this time only ten prosecution witnesses have been examined out of total thirty three witnesses. Counsel further submits that later on other accused have been arrested and they have been charge-sheeted against, in which total fifty two witnesses have been cited in the list of witnesses. It is further argued that proceedings under Section 446 Cr.P.C. is going on against the petitioner and the trial is yet pending. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody since 11.12.2020 and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
4. I have considered the submissions made by both the parties and have perused the material available on record. The p
Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. reported in AIR 1978 SC 597
Abdul Rehman Antulay & Ors. Vs. R.S. Nayak & Ors.
Union of India (UOI) Vs. K.A. Najeeb
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors.
Mohammed Zubair Vs. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors, Writ Petition (Criminal) No 279 of 2022
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21, and prolonged detention without trial is impermissible.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and prolonged incarceration without trial violates this right.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right, and prolonged detention without trial is a violation of this right.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21, and prolonged detention without trial infringes on personal liberty.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, and prolonged detention without trial is unjust.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and prolonged detention without trial is a violation of this right. The court emphasized that pre-con....
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and prolonged pre-trial detention without justifiable reasons is a violation of this right.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, and prolonged detention without trial is unjust.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, ensuring that no accused is unjustly detained for prolonged periods without trial.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, and prolonged detention without trial is unjustifiable.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.