SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1693

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN, PRINCIPAL BENCH AT JODHPUR
SANDEEP MEHTA, RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI, JJ.
Dakshita Modi - Petitioner
Versus
Commissioner, State Goods and Service Tax and Others - Respondents
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1896 of 2023
Decided On : 07-02-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Javed Hussain.
For the Respondent: Mr. Keshar Singh associate to Mr. Hemant Dutt.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 21 - GST Registration Cancellation - Writ petition filed against the cancellation of GST registration due to financial difficulties during the pandemic - Appeal against the cancellation dismissed without speaking order - Court restored GST registration, recognizing the infringement of the right to earn livelihood. (Paras 2, 3, 5, 6)

(B) Administrative Procedure - Requirement of speaking orders to ensure transparency and provide a rationale for decisions made by authorities. (Paras 2, 4)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged the cancellation of GST registration due to inability to pay GST on time during the pandemic, and the subsequent appeal was dismissed without reason.

Findings of Court:
The cancellation order was quashed, and the GST registration was ordered to be restored, acknowledging the exceptional circumstances of the pandemic.

Issues: Whether the cancellation of GST registration and the dismissal of the appeal infringe the fundamental right to livelihood.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the necessity to consider the impact of the pandemic on the petitioner's ability to comply with tax obligations, holding that restoration of registration is warranted under the circumstances.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's gst registration cancellation history. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner's financial difficulties during covid affect registration. (Para 3 , 4)
3. restoration of gst registration due to compelling circumstances. (Para 5)
4. impugned orders quashed, registration restored. (Para 6)
5. writ petition allowed. (Para 7)

ORDER :

1. Heard learned counsel representing the parties. Perused the material available on record.

2. The instant writ petition has been preferred under Article 226 of Constitution of India for assailing the order dated 08.12.2021 whereby, the GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled by the respondent No. 3-The Assistant Commissioner, Circle Sirohi. Being aggrieved of the order dated 08.12.2021, the petitioner filed an appeal through online portal on 03.06.2022, which was dismissed by the respondent No. 2-The Additional Commissioner (Appeals), vide a non-speaking order dated 10.08.2022.

3. Learned counsel Shri Javed Hussain representing the petitioner, urged that the petitioner was prevented from making payment of GST on time because of financial crunch faced during the covid period. On this account, the respondent No. 3-Department issued a show cause notice dated 25.11.2021 to the petitioner and cancelled its GST registration. The petitioner filed an appeal against cancellation of GST registration, which has been dismissed by the respondent No. 2 authority vide order dated 10.08.2022. Shri Hussain, learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that dismissal of the petitioner's appeal against cancellation of registration has resulted into the petitioner not being able to carry on his business and thus, this is a direct infringement of the petitioner's fundamental right to earn livelihood as guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution of India. He thus, urged that the impugned orders dated 08.12.2021 and 10.08.2022 passed by the respondents authorities, deserve to be quashed and set aside and a direction be issued upon the respondents authorities to restore the GST registration of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel Shri Keshar Singh on behalf of Shri Hemant Dutt, representing the respondents GST authorities, does not object to the prayer if the GST registration of the petitioner is restored, subject to the right of the authorities to effect recoveries of tax, etc. if any due against the petitioner.

5. In view of the submissions advanced at bar, we feel that as the failure of the petitioner to file the returns was during the period when Covid Pandemic was prevailing, the GST registration of the petitioner deserves to be restored.

6. As a consequence, the impugned order dated 08.12.02021 and the order dated 10.08.2022 passed by the respondents authorities, are quashed and set aside. The GST registration of the petitioner shall be restored forthwith. Needless to say, that if any dues of tax, etc. are outstanding against the petitioner, the same may be recovered as per law.

7. The writ petition is allowed in these terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top