IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
VIVEK CHAUDHARY, MANISH KUMAR, JJ.
Surendra Bahadur Singh - Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. and 2 Others. - Respondents
WRIT TAX NO. 172 OF 2023.
Decided On : 23-08-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. cancellation of registration and procedural facts (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. appeal dismissal due to statutory limitations (Para 5) |
| 3. lack of reasoning in administrative orders under article 14 (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. directive for fresh order post setting aside cancellation (Para 9 , 10) |
JUDGMENT
Heard Sri Rishi Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 07.01.2023 whereby the registration of the petitioner was cancelled as well as the appellate order dated 01.07.2023 whereby the appeal was dismissed as being beyond the prescribed period of limitation.
3. The facts, in brief, are that the petitioner is a proprietorship concern engaged in civil contractual works and was registered under the GST Act. It appears that as the GST returns was not filed by the counsel, a show-cause notice dated 03.11.2022 was served. In the said show-cause notice, the reasons as prescribed were as under:
4. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner did not have knowledge of the show-cause notice on account of COVID-19 upsurge, thus, the reply could not be filed and an order came to be passed on 07.01.2023 (Annexure - 2) whereby registration was cancelled. The gist of the cancellation order is reproduced herein below:
Order for Cancellation of Registration
| Head | Central Tax | State Tax/UT Tax | Integrated Tax | Cess |
| Tax | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Interest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Penalty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Others | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Sameer Kumar Srivastava
Assistant Commissioner
Gonda, Sector-3"
5. The petitioner could not prefer an appeal, which is prescribed under the Act, on account of Covid - 19 situation and the fact that the petitioner fell ill for which medical certificates were granted, as such, the petitioner preferred a delay condonation application along with the appeal. The Appellate Authority was of the view that in view of the Bar created under Section 107 of the GST Act, the delay cannot be condoned, as such, he proceeded to dismiss the appeal holding that no power of condonation of delay exists in the statutory scheme of Section 107
Quasi-judicial orders must include reasoning; lack of justification for cancellation of registration violates principles of natural justice and the Constitution.
The importance of providing detailed reasons for cancellation of registration and the need for compliance with the principles of natural justice.
Orders lacking reasoning do not meet constitutional scrutiny under Article 14, allowing for judicial review and the right to respond to show cause notices.
The serious illness of a Managing Director can justify delays in responding to regulatory notices, warranting restoration of GST registration.
The court held that cancellation of GST registration without proper notice or reasoning violates principles of natural justice, resulting in quashing the cancellation order.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.