IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
VIVEK CHAUDHARY, MANISH KUMAR, JJ.
Surendra Bahadur Singh - Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. and 2 Others. - Respondents
WRIT TAX NO. 172 OF 2023.
Decided On : 23-08-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. cancellation of registration and procedural facts (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. appeal dismissal due to statutory limitations (Para 5) |
| 3. lack of reasoning in administrative orders under article 14 (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. directive for fresh order post setting aside cancellation (Para 9 , 10) |
JUDGMENT
Heard Sri Rishi Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 07.01.2023 whereby the registration of the petitioner was cancelled as well as the appellate order dated 01.07.2023 whereby the appeal was dismissed as being beyond the prescribed period of limitation.
3. The facts, in brief, are that the petitioner is a proprietorship concern engaged in civil contractual works and was registered under the GST Act. It appears that as the GST returns was not filed by the counsel, a show-cause notice dated 03.11.2022 was served. In the said show-cause notice, the reasons as prescribed were as under:
"Whereas on the basis of information which has come to my notice, it appears that your registration is liable to be cancelled for the following reasons:
1. Any Taxpayer other than composition taxpayer has not filed returns for a continuous period of six months
You are hereby directed to furnish a reply to the notice within seven working days from the date of service of this notice.
If you fail to furnish a reply within the stipulated date or fail to appear for personal hearing on the appointed date and time, the case will be decided ex parte on the basis of available records and on merits.
Please note that your registration stands suspended with effect from 03.11.2023."
4. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner did not have knowledge of the show-cause notice on account of COVID-19 upsurge, thus, the reply could not be filed and an order came to be passed on 07.01.2023 (Annexure - 2) whereby registration was cancelled. The gist of the cancellation order is reproduced herein below:
"Reference Number: ZA090123054692M Dated: 07.01.2023
To
Surendra Bahadur Singh
M/s Surendra Bahadur Singh Contractor, Chokaghat, Wazirganj, Gonda, Gonda, Uttar Pradesh, 271124
GSTIN/UIN: 09BAWPS0102G1ZL
Application Reference No. (ARN): AA091122013056T Dated:03/11/2022
Order for Cancellation of Registration
This has reference to your reply dated 15.11.2022 in response to the notice to show cause dated 03.11.2022 Whereas no reply to notice to show cause has been submitted;
The effective date of cancellation of your registration is 07.01.2023.
Determination of amount payable pursuant to cancellation:
Accordingly, the amount payable by you and the computation and basis thereof is as follows:
The amounts determined as being payable above are without prejudice to any amount that may be found to be payable you on submission of final return fumished by you.
You are required to pay the following amounts on or before 17.01.2023 failing which the amount will be recovered in accordance with the provisions of the Act and rules made thereunder.
| Head | Central Tax | State Tax/UT Tax | Integrated Tax | Cess |
| Tax | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Interest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Penalty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Others | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Place: Uttar Pradesh
Date: 07.01.2023
Sameer Kumar Srivastava
Assistant Commissioner
Gonda, Sector-3"
5. The petitioner could not prefer an appeal, which is prescribed under the Act, on account of Covid - 19 situation and the fact that the petitioner fell ill for which medical certificates were granted, as such, the petitioner preferred a delay condonation application along with the appeal. The Appellate Authority was of the view that in view of the Bar created under Section 107 of the GST Act, the delay cannot be condoned, as such, he proceeded to dismiss the appeal holding that no power of condonation of delay exists in the statutory scheme of Section 107
AI
Quasi-judicial orders must include reasoning; lack of justification for cancellation of registration violates principles of natural justice and the Constitution.
The importance of providing detailed reasons for cancellation of registration and the need for compliance with the principles of natural justice.
Orders lacking reasoning do not meet constitutional scrutiny under Article 14, allowing for judicial review and the right to respond to show cause notices.
The serious illness of a Managing Director can justify delays in responding to regulatory notices, warranting restoration of GST registration.
The court held that cancellation of GST registration without proper notice or reasoning violates principles of natural justice, resulting in quashing the cancellation order.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.