SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 1054

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
Anil Kumar Upman, J.
Bharat Kumar – Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan and Others – Respondents
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2109 of 2019
Decided On : 12-03-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Samarth Sharma
For the Respondents: Sanjeev Mahala, Ashutosh Bhatia

IMPORTANT POINT
Only officers of and above the rank of Assistant Sub-Inspector are authorized to conduct investigations of cognizable offences, as per Section 157 Cr.P.C. and Rajasthan Police Rules.

Headnote:

(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 157 - Rajasthan Police Rules, 1965 - Investigation of cognizable offences - The court held that only officers of and above the rank of Assistant Sub-Inspector are empowered to conduct investigations of cognizable offences, rejecting the contrary view in State of Rajasthan v. Kera & Ors. (Paras 10, 11, 12, 13)

(B) Judicial Discipline - The court emphasized the importance of judicial discipline and the need for a larger bench to resolve conflicting interpretations regarding the authority of police officers in investigations. (Paras 12, 14)

Facts of the case:

The petitioner sought to quash criminal proceedings based on an FIR, arguing that the investigation was improperly conducted by a Head Constable.

Findings of Court:

The court found that the Head Constable lacked the authority to conduct the investigation, necessitating a larger bench's review of the issue.

Issues: The main issue was whether a Head Constable can conduct investigations of cognizable offences.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that only officers of ASI rank or above are authorized to conduct such investigations, emphasizing the need for adherence to legal provisions.

Result: The matter was directed to be placed before the Chief Justice for constituting an appropriate bench.

ORDER :

1. The instant misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for quashing the entire criminal proceedings of Case No. 1912/17, pending trial before learned Metropolitan Magistrate No. 26, Jaipur Metropolitan City (Sanganer), arising out of FIR No. 47/17 PS Sanganer Sadar, Jaipur (South) for offences under Sections 341, 323 and 506 IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently and fervently contends that the entire criminal proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR is vitiated as investigation of the present case has been conducted by a Head Constable, who was not empowered to conduct the investigation of the case involving cognizable offence(s). He further submits that not only investigation was conducted by a Head Constable but charge-sheet was also filed by him, which is apparent from the charge sheet filed before the learned court below. He has placed reliance on the following judgments:

(i) Pankaj Bansal & Anr v. State of Rajasthan, 2018 (1) Cri. LR (Raj) 1

(ii) Pharisa Promin & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan, 2019 (4) Cr. L.R. (Raj. 1797

3. Learned counsel also draws attention of the Court to the information received under RTI Act from the office of Addl. Director General of Police, Crime Branch, Rajasthan as per which, only the police officers of and above the rank of ASI are empowered to conduct investigation. The aforesaid information received under RTI Act by the petitioner, is reproduced herein-below for the sake of ready reference:

dk;kZy; vfr&egkfuns'kd iqfyl] vijk/k 'kk[kk] jktLFkku

Øekad%&o&15 ¼65½ m-e-fu-@lh-ch-@lw-v-@2019@752

fnukad%&01-03-2016

Jh Hkjr dqekj 'kekZ]

fuoklh & e-u- ch&206] ySV ua- 505]

jktsUnz ekxZ] ckiw uxj] t;iqjA

fo”k;%& lwpuk dk vf/kdkj vf/kfu;e] 2005 ds rgr pkgh xbZ lwpuk ds lEcU/k esaA

egksn;]

mijksDr fo”k;kUrxZr vki }kjk izsf”kr vkosnu i= fnukad 14-02-2019 dks bl dk;kZy; esa izkIr gqvkA izkIr vkosnu i= esa vuqla/kku ds lEcU/k esa pkgh xbZ lwpuk ds lEcU/k esa ys[k gS fd jktLFkku iqfyl fu;e 1965 ds fu;e 6-1 ¼2½ }kjk lgk;d mi fujh{kd rd ds iqfyl vf/kdkfj;ksa dks gh vfHk;ksxksa ds vuqla/kku ds fy, vf/kd`r fd;k x;k gSA

;fn vki mDr lwpuk ls larq”V ugha gSa] rks vfrfjDr egkfuns'kd iqfyl] vijk/k ,oa izFke vihy vf/kdkjh] iqfyl eq[;ky;] yky dksBh] jktLFkku] t;iqj dks i= izkfIr ds 30 fnol esa izFke vihy izLrqr dj ldrs gSaA

lnHkkoh

izfr layXu

¼fodkl dqekj½

mi&egkfujh{kd iqfyl

jkT; yksd lwpuk vf/kdkjh

lh-vkbZ-Mh ¼lh-ch-½ jktLFkku] t;iqjA

4. On these submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner craves acceptance of the instant misc. petition and quashing of the entire criminal proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR.

5. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant oppose the submissions of the petitioner's counsel. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that the issue/argument raised by counsel for the petitioner has already been discussed and considered in the case of State of Rajasthan v. Kera & Ors. (1998) 3 RLW (Raj.) 1577 wherein it was held that Head Constable is well within his power to conduct investigation of a case involving cognizable offence(s).

6. I have given my thoughtful consideration to the submissions advanced at bar and perused the material available on record. I have also gone through the judgments cited by both the sides.

7. The question arises for consideration of this Court is whether a Head Constable can conduct investigation of a case involving cognizable offence or not.

8. Section 157 of Cr.P.C prescribes procedure for investigation. The same is reproduced hereinbelow for the sake of ready-reference:

“Section 157 Procedure for investigation.

(1) If, from information received or otherwise, an officer in charge of a police station has reason to suspect the commission of an offence which he is empowered under section 156 to investigate, he shall forthwith send a report of the same to a Magistrate empowered to take cognizance of such offence upon a police report and shall proceed in person, or shall depute

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top